References

Allan HT, Smith P. Are pedagogies used in nurse education research evident in practice?. Nurse Educ Today. 2010; 30:(5)476-479 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2009.10.011

Biggs J, Tang C. Teaching for quality learning at university, 4th edn. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2011

Bryman A. Social research methods, 4th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012

Clark E, Draper J, Rogers J. Illuminating the process: enhancing the impact of continuing professional education on practice. Nurse Educ Today. 2015; 35:(2)388-394 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2014.10.014

Creswell JW, Creswell JD. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 5th edn. London: Sage Publications; 2017

Crozier K, Moore J, Kite K. Innovations and action research to develop research skills for nursing and midwifery practice: the Innovations in Nursing and Midwifery Practice Project study. J Clin Nurs. 2012; 21:(11-12)1716-1725 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03936.x

Doody O, Slevin E, Taggart L. Focus group interviews in nursing research: part 1. Br J Nurs. 2013a; 22:(1)16-19 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2013.22.1.16

Doody O, Slevin E, Taggart L. Preparing for and conducting focus groups in nursing research: part 2. Br J Nurs. 2013b; 22:(3)170-173 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2013.22.3.170

Draper J, Beretta R, Kenward L, McDonagh L, Messenger J, Rounce J. ‘Ready to hit the ground running’: alumni and employer accounts of a unique part-time distance learning pre-registration nurse education programme. Nurse Educ Today. 2014; 34:(10)1305-1310 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2014.06.007

Draper J, Clark L, Rogers J. Managers' role in maximising investment in continuing professional education. Nurs Manage. 2016; 22:(9)30-36 https://doi.org/10.7748/nm.22.9.30.s29

Froggatt K, Hockley J. Action research in palliative care: defining an evaluation methodology. Palliat Med. 2011; 25:(8)782-787 https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216311420483

Gurukkal R. Towards Outcome-based Education. Higher Education for the Future. 2018; 5:(1)1-3 https://doi.org/10.1177/2347631117740456

Gijbels H, O'Connell R, Dalton-O'Connor C, O'Donovan M. A systematic review evaluating the impact of post-registration nursing and midwifery education on practice. Nurse Educ Pract. 2010; 10:(2)64-69 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2009.03.011

Gould D, Drey N, Berridge EJ. Nurses' experiences of continuing professional development. Nurse Educ Today. 2007; 27:(6)602-609 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2006.08.021

Hegney DG, Francis K. Action research: changing nursing practice. Nurs Stand. 2015; 29:(40)36-41 https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.29.40.36.e8710

Jayasekara RS. Focus groups in nursing research: methodological perspectives. Nurs Outlook. 2012; 60:(6)411-416 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2012.02.001

Jonas D, Burns B. The transition to blended e-learning. Changing the focus of educational delivery in children pain management. Nurse Educ Pract. 2010; 10:(1)1-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2009.01.015

Koch LF. The nursing educator's role in e-learning: A literature review. Nurse Educ Today. 2014; 34:(11)1382-1387 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2014.04.002

Krueger R, Casey M. Focus groups. A practical guide for applied research, 5th edn. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2015

Lahti M, Kontio R, Pitkänen A, Välimäki M. Knowledge transfer from an e-learning course to clinical practice. Nurse Educ Today. 2014; 34:(5)842-847 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.09.003

Lee NJ. An evaluation of CPD learning and impact upon positive practice change. Nurse Educ Today. 2011; 31:(4)390-395 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2010.07.012

Lumbers M. Approaches to leadership and managing change in the NHS. Br J Nurs. 2018; 27:(10)554-558 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2018.27.10.554

Manley K, Martin A, Jackson C, Wright T. A realist synthesis of effective continuing professional development (CPD): a case study of healthcare practitioners' CPD. Nurse Educ Today. 2018; 69:134-141 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.07.010

Ousey K, Roberts D. Improving access to CPD for nurses: the uptake of online provision. Br J Community Nurs. 2013; 18:(2)78-83 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjcn.2013.18.2.78

Pawson R. The science of evaluation. A realist manifesto.London: Sage Publications; 2013

Ryder M, Browne F, Galvin C, Leonard O, O'Reilly J. Fit for purpose? Evaluation of CPD courses for nurses in an Irish university teaching hospital. Br J Nurs. 2018; 27:(8)434-441 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2018.27.8.434

Schnetter VA, Lacy D, Jones MM, Bakrim K, Allen PE, O'Neal C. Course development for web-based nursing education programs. Nurse Educ Pract. 2014; 14:(6)635-640 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2014.06.007

Shaha M, Wenzel J, Hill EE. Planning and conducting focus group research with nurses. Nurse Res. 2011; 18:(2)77-87 https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2011.01.18.2.77.c8286

Shin S, Park J-H, Kim J-H. Effectiveness of patient simulation in nursing education: meta-analysis. Nurse Educ Today. 2015; 35:(1)176-182 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2014.09.009

Stott A, Mozer M. Connecting learners online: challenges and issues for nurse education—Is there a way forward?. Nurse Educ Today. 2016; 39:152-154 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.02.002

Stringer E. Action research, 4th edn. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2013

Tame SL. Secret study: A new concept in continuing professional education. Nurse Educ Today. 2011; 31:(5)482-487 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2010.09.007

Winter R, Munn-Giddings C. A handbook for action research in health and social care.Oxon: Routledge; 2013

Stakeholder perceptions of curriculum design, development and delivery for continuing e-learning for nurses

24 September 2020
13 min read
Volume 29 · Issue 17

Abstract

Background:

This paper reports the qualitative findings from stage 5 of an action research project which involved the redesign of continuing professional education (CPE) courses in one organisation.

Aim:

The aim of this study was to explore key stakeholders perceptions of the teaching, learning and outcomes of a new curriculum design for CPE involving e-learning.

Method:

This project used participatory action research, involving stakeholders as participants in a process of inquiry about the change. The study took place in an academic teaching hospital and consisted of three focus group interviews with a total of 20 nurses. Participants included stakeholders who had developed curricula and managers from clinical areas where CPE courses had been undertaken.

Findings:

Four main themes emerged, revealing staff perceptions on the process of change and their own ‘lightbulb moments’ experienced during this process. Results also indicate that the change has resulted in learner-focused CPE, with a range of opportunities for continued educational development in future.

Conclusion:

Key stakeholders' experience is seldom reported in studies related to CPE. This study provides an insight into the experiences of key stakeholders in relation to the development and delivery of CPE courses. Stakeholders indicated that they were able to see the benefits of implementing new CPE curricula they had contributed to. They also commented that clinical-pertinent and competence-based courses were more learner focused as a result of combining online content with supported workshops.

Healthcare organisations currently face multiple challenges in delivering safe, effective nursing care in environments that are becoming increasing complex (Draper et al, 2014). Acute tertiary hospitals require knowledgeable, skilled registered nurses to care for patients in specialist areas (Ryder et al, 2018); thus, continuing professional education (CPE) is fundamental in ensuring that frontline nurses are able to practise safely and effectively (Manley et al, 2018). Although much of the literature calls for empirical evidence in relation to the impact and outcomes of CPE (Hegney et al, 2015; Lee, 2011; Clark et al, 2015), it is also essential that an understanding of the process for the development and delivery of effective CPE is established. There is little empirical evidence in relation to the outcomes of CPE, so further evidence is required into the key roles of stakeholders in the process of development and delivery of effective CPE (Draper et al, 2014).

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Nursing and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for nurses. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to clinical or professional articles

  • Unlimited access to the latest news, blogs and video content