References

Brandon T. Professionals. In: Cameron C (ed). London: Sage; 2014

Cameron C. Whose problem? Disability narratives and available identities. Community Dev J.. 2007; 42:(4)501-511 https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsm040

Cameron C. Tragic but brave or just crips with chips? Songs and their lyrics in the Disability Arts Movement in Britain. Popular Music. 2009; 28:(3)381-396 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261143009990122

Disability arts: from the social model to the affirmative model. 2011. https://tinyurl.com/voavtbm (accessed 3 March 2020)

Cameron C Disability studies: a student's guide.(ed). London: Sage; 2014

Why we are disabled people, not people with disabilities. 2015. https://tinyurl.com/vn2syh8 (accessed 28 February 2020)

CBC News. More information, links and interview transcript for Amanda Baggs. 2009. https://tinyurl.com/spvkys9 (accessed 28 February 2020)

Davies J. The importance of suffering. The value and meaning of emotional discontent.Hove: Routledge; 2012

Davis LJ. Introduction: disability, normality and power, 5th edn. In: Davis LJ (ed). Abingdon: Routledge; 2017

Disability Equality in Education. Inclusion in schools. 2002. https://tinyurl.com/ryzprcx (accessed 28 February 2020)

Elias N. The society of individuals.London: Continuum; 2001

Heaton T. Access. In: Cameron C (ed). London: Sage; 2014

Michalko R. The difference that disability makes.Philadelphia (PA): Temple University Press; 2002

Milton DEM. A mismatch of salience. Explorations of the nature of autism from theory to practice.Hove: Pavilion Publishing; 2017

Little acts of degradation: Ragged Edge online launches Project Cleigh’. 2006. https://tinyurl.com/t2lxm4w (accessed 28 February 2020)

Morris J. Pride against prejudice. Transforming attitudes to disability.London: The Women's Press; 1991

Nursing and Midwifery Council. The code: professional standards of practice and behaviour for nurses, midwives and nursing associates. 2018. https://tinyurl.com/gozgmtm (accessed 28 February 2020)

Oliver M, Barnes C. The new politics of disablement.Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2012

Sainsbury C. Martian in the playground: understanding the schoolchild with Asperger's syndrome, Revised edn. London: Sage; 2009

Slorach R. A very capitalist condition: a history and politics of disability.London: Bookmarks Publications; 2016

Swain J, French S. Disability on equal terms.London: Sage; 2008

Thomas C. Female forms: experiencing and understanding disability.Buckingham: Open University Press; 1999

Tollifson J. Imperfection is a beautiful thing: on disability and meditation. In: Fries K (ed). New York (NY): Plume Books; 1997

Fundamental Principles of Disability.London: UPIAS; 1976

World Health Organization. International classification of impairments, disabilities, and handicaps: a manual of classification relating to the consequences of disease, published in accordance with resolution WHA29.35 of the Twenty-ninth World Health Assembly. 1976. https://tinyurl.com/wae9mbc (accessed 28 February 2020)

World Health Organization. How to use the ICF. Practical manual for using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). 2013. https://tinyurl.com/qqnpo7r (accessed 3 March 2020)

What's wrong with ‘seeing the person first’?

12 March 2020
9 min read
Volume 29 · Issue 5

Abstract

Person-first thinking makes it a virtue to ‘see the person, not the disability’, overlooking, or making an effort to overlook, a person's impairment in order to see ‘the person within’. This might seem a caring and compassionate approach in everyday nursing practice, but on closer examination it can be seen as unhelpful and even discriminatory. This article considers why this should be the case and introduces the affirmation model as a basis for a different way of thinking about the issue.

Person first thinking makes it a virtue to ‘see the person not the disability’, considering it a kindness to overlook, or to make an effort to overlook, a person's impairment in order to see ‘the person within’ (Michalko, 2002). At first glance, this might seem a caring and compassionate approach within everyday nursing practice; however, on closer examination it can be seen as unhelpful and possibly even discriminatory. It rests on outdated Cartesian ideas about the body and the self—as if the disabled person is trapped within a ‘flawed’ body and that there is a ‘normal’ healthy person struggling to get out (Cameron, 2014:17–19). It is also based on a number of misplaced assumptions about the experience of impairment, treating this as something invariably unpleasant and regrettable (Morris, 1991). Furthermore, it involves a persistent way of thinking about impairment that has long been contested by disabled people (Cameron, 2015).

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Nursing and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for nurses. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to clinical or professional articles

  • Unlimited access to the latest news, blogs and video content