References

Alexandrou E, Ray-Barruel G, Frost S Prevalence of the use of PIVCs. J Hosp Med.. 2015; 8:530-533

Smith RV, Shah V, Goldman RD Caregivers' responses to pain in their children in the emergency department. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med.. 2007; 161:578-582

Yen K, Riegert A, Gorelick MH Derivation of the DIVA score: a clinical prediction rule for the identification of children with difficult intravenous access. Pediatr Emerg Care.. 2008; 24:143-147

Riker M, Kennedy C, Winfrey B Validation and refinement of the difficult intravenous access score: a clinical prediction rule for identifying children with difficult intravenous access. Acad Emerg Med.. 2011; 18:1129-1134

O'Neill MB, Dillane M, Abu Hanipah NF Validating the difficult intravenous access clinical prediction rule. Pediatr Emerg Care.. 2012; 28:1314-1316

Schoenfeld E, Boniface K, Shokoohi H ED technicians can successfully place ultrasound-guided intravenous catheters in patients with poor vascular access. Am J Emerg Med.. 2011; 29:496-501

Frey AM Success rates for peripheral i.v. insertion in a children's hospital. Financial implications. J Intraven Nurs.. 1998; 21:160-165

Shokoohi H, Boniface K, Kulie P The utility and survivorship of peripheral intravenous catheters inserted in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med.. 2019; 74:381-390

Utility of the DIVA score for experienced emergency department technicians

23 January 2020
Volume 29 · Issue 2

Abstract

Background:

The DIVA score is validated for predicting success of the initial attempt at peripheral intravenous insertion by nurses and physicians. A score of 4 or greater is 50% to 60% likely to have a failed first attempt. The study objective was to assess the validity of this score for emergency department technicians.

Methods:

This study used a prospective convenience sample of 181 children presenting to the emergency department with intravenous access attempt by one of 29 emergency department technicians. DIVA score, total number of attempts, and median time to successful intravenous cannulation were obtained.

Results:

Comparing patients with a DIVA score <4 to ≥4, first-time IV placement failure rates were lower (9% [95% CI, 3–24] vs. 41% [95% CI, 33–49]) and median time to IV placement was shorter (75 [interquartile range (IQR) 42–157] vs. 254 [IQR 91–806]) seconds. In patients with scores ≥4, emergency department technicians with ≥5 years of experience were significantly more likely to be successful on the first attempt (OR 2.8; 95% CI, 1.03–7.63). For every year of technician experience, the time to catheter placement, adjusted for DIVA score, decreased by 25 minutes (P≤0.05, R2=0.05). Comparing our receiver operating curve to the derivation study, the areas were similar (0.67 vs. 0.65).

Conclusions:

This study provides preliminary evidence for the validity of the DIVA score when applied to IVs placed by emergency department technicians. For patients with high DIVA scores, ≥5 years of IV experience was associated with higher odds of successful first-time IV placement and shorter time to placement.

HIGHLIGHTS

The difficult intravenous access (DIVA) score may be generalizable to IVs placed by experienced emergency department technicians (EDTs)

Higher odds of first-time success in difficult patients with ≥5 years EDT experience

Early identification of difficult access may allow for aid of alternative technology

Likely first study to evaluate EDTs IV skills in patients with varying DIVA scores

Worldwide, over a billion peripheral intravenous (IV) catheters are placed each year.1 Establishing IV access in pediatric patients can be challenging due to age, prematurity, body habitus, or other underlying medical conditions. Often, multiple attempts are required before successful IV placement, leading to patient/caregiver anxiety, pain, and dissatisfaction.2 The difficult intravenous access (DIVA) score is a 4-variable proportionally weighted rule in which subjects with a score of 4 or greater are more likely to have a failed IV placement on the first attempt.3Table 1 outlines the weight of factors included in the DIVA score: prematurity, age, palpability, and visibility of a vein.

In the initial validation of the DIVA score with nurse-performed IV placement, a DIVA score of 4 or greater was associated with a 50% or greater likelihood of a failed first attempt.3 External validation found a DIVA score of 4 or greater predicted a more than 60% likelihood of failed first attempt IV catheterization by nurses and nearly 40% by physicians.4,5

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Nursing and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for nurses. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to clinical or professional articles

  • Unlimited access to the latest news, blogs and video content