References

Alexandrou E., Ramjan L., Murphy J., Hunt L., Betihavas V., Frost S. A Training of undergraduate clinicians in vascular access: An integrative review. Journal of the Association for Vascular Access. 2012; 17:(3)146-158

Arslan S., Kuzu Kurban, N., Takmak S., Sanlialp Zeyrek, A., Oztik S., Senol H Effectiveness of simulation based peripheral intravenous catheterization training for nursing students and hospital nurses: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2022; 31:(5–6)483-496 https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15960

Ashraf H., Sodergren M. H., Merali N., Mylonas G., Singh H., Darzi A Eye-tracking technology in medical education: A systematic review. Medical teacher. 2018; 40:(1)62-69

Ballard H. A., Hajduk J., Cheon E. C., King M. R., Barsuk J. H Clinical and demographic factors associated with pediatric difficult intravenous access in the operating room. Paediatric Anaesthesia. 2022; 32:(7)792-800 https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.14438

Buyukyilmaz F., Sendir M., Kus B., Yaman Guclu, H The effectiveness of a non tourniquet procedure on peripheral intravenous catheterization in older patients: A pilot study. Contemporary Nurse: A Journal for the Australian Nursing Profession. 2020; 56:(5–6)405-416 https://doi.org/10.1080/10376178.2020.1801351

Carr P., Rippey J., Budgeon C., Cooke M., Higgins N., Rickard C Insertion of peripheral intravenous cannulae in the emergency department: Factors associated with first attempt success. The Journal of the Association for Vascular Access. 2016; 20:(4)256-257 https://doi.org/10.5301/jva.5000487

Catarino F., Lourenço C., Correia C., Doria J., Dixe M., Santos C., Sousa J., Mendonca S., Cardoso D., Costeira C Nursing care in peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC): Protocol of a best practice implementation project. Nursing Reports (Pavia, Italy). 2022; 12:(3)515-519 https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep12030049

Causer J., Vickers J. N., Snelgrove R., Arsenault G., Harvey A Performing under pressure: Quiet eye training improves surgical knot-tying performance. Surgery. 2014; 156:(5)1089-1096 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2014.05.004

Chan A.-W., Tetzlaff J. M., Altman D. G., Laupacis A., Gøtzsche P. C., Krleža-Jerić K., Hróbjartsson A., Mann H., Dickersin K., Berlin J., Doré C., Parulekar W., Summerskill W., Groves T., Schulz K., Sox H., Rockhold F. W., Rennie D., Moher D SPIRIT 2013 statement: Defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2013; 158:200-207

Chan A.-W., Tetzlaff J. M., Gøtzsche P. C., Altman D. G., Mann H., Berlin J., Dickersin K., Hróbjartsson A., Schulz K. F., Parulekar W. R., Krleža-Jerić K., Laupacis A., Moherj D SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: Guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ. 2013; 346:(7586)

Frey A Success rates for peripheral IV insertion in a children's hospital. Financial implications. Journal of Intravenous Nursing. 1998; 21:(3)160-165

Gorski L. A., Hadaway L., Hagle M. E., Broadhurst D., Clare S., Kleidon T., Meyer B. M., Nickel B., Rowley S., Sharpe E., Alexander M Infusion therapy standards of practice (8th ed.). Journal of Infusion Nursing. 2021; 44:(1)1-224 https://doi.org/10.1097/NAN.0000000000000396

Kang M., Ragan B. G., Park J. H Issues in outcomes research: An overview of randomization techniques for clinical trials. Journal of Athletic Training. 2008; 43:(2)215-221 https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-43.2.215

Karanicolas P. J., Farrokhyar F., Bhandari M Practical tips for surgical research: Blinding: Who, what, when, why, how?. Canadian Journal of Surgery. 2010; 53:(5)345-348

Lin J. Y., Lu Y Establishing a data monitoring committee for clinical trials. Shanghai Archives of Psychiatry. 2014; 26:(1)

Marsh N., Webster J., Larsen E., Genzel J., Cooke M., Mihala G., Cadigan S., Rickard C. M Expert versus generalist inserters for peripheral intravenous catheter insertion: A pilot randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2018; 19:(1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2946-3

Marsh N., Webster J., Ullman A., Mihala G., Cooke M., Chopra V., Rickard C Peripheral intravenous catheter non-infectious complications in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2020; 76:(12)3346-3362 https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14565

Millington S., Hendin A., Shiloh A. L., Koenig S Better with ultrasound: Peripheral intravenous catheter insertion. Chest. 2020; 157:(2)369-375 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2019.04.139

Parker S. I. A., Benzies K. M., Hayden K. A., Lang E. S Effectiveness of interventions for adult peripheral intravenous catheterization: A systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. International Emergency Nursing. 2017; 31:15-21 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ienj.2016.05.004

Parker S. I. A., Simmons S. M., Rutherford A., Caird J. K., Benzies K. M Novice and expert nurses' eye movements and success with simulated peripheral intravenous catheterization. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2021; 53:42-48 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2020.12.010

Polit D. F., Beck C. T Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice, 10th ed. : Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2017

Research Randomizer. Randomizer.org. 2020. www.randomizer.org

Rivaz M., Momennasab M., Yektatalab S., Ebadi A Adequate resources as essential component in the nursing practice environment: A qualitative study. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2017; 11:(6) https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2017/25349.9986

Rodriguez-Calero M., de Pedro-Gomez J. E., Molero-Ballester L. J., Fernandez-Fernandez I., Matamalas-Massanet C., Moreno-Mejias L., Blanco-Mavillard I., Moya-Suarez A. B., Personat-Labrador C., Morales-Asencio J. M Risk factors for difficult peripheral intravenous cannulation. The PIVV2 multicentre case-control study. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2020; 9:(3) https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9030799

Santos F., Flumignan R. L. G., Areias L. L., Sarpe A. K. P., Amaral F. C. F., Avila R. B. de, Vasconcelos V. T. de, Guedes Neto, H. J., Amorim J. E. de, Nakano L. C. U Peripherally inserted central catheter versus central venous catheter for intravenous access: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine. 2020; 99:(30) https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000020352

Santos-Costa P., Paiva-Santos F., Sousa L. B., Bernardes R. A., Ventura F., Fearnley W. D., Salgueiro-Oliveira A., Parreira P., Vieira M., Graveto J Nurses' practices in the peripheral intravenous catheterization of adult oncology patients: A mix-method study. Journal of Personalized Medicine. 2022; 12:(2) https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12020151

Schuster C., Stahl B., Murray C., Keleekai N. L., Glover K Development and testing of a short peripheral intravenous catheter insertion skills checklist. Journal of the Association for Vascular Access. 2016; 21:(4)196-204 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.java.2016.08.003

Tobii Pro Lab Analyzer Edition User Manual. Version PDF Free Download. (n.d.). 2024. www.vinis.co.kr/TPL_manual.pdf

Vickers J. N Visual control when aiming at a far target. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance. 1996; 22:(2)342-354 https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.22.2.342

Vickers J. N Perception, cognition, and decision training: The Quiet Eye in action.: Human Kinetics; 2007

Vickers J. N Origins and current issues in Quiet Eye research. Current Issues in Sport Science. 2016; 1 https://doi.org/10.15203/CISS_2016.101

Woolley N. N., Jarvis Y Situated cognition and cognitive apprenticeship: A model for teaching and learning clinical skills in a technologically rich and authentic learning environment. Nurse Education Today. 2007; 27:(1)73-79 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2006.02.010

Yalçınlı S., Akarca F. K., Can O., Sener A., Akbinar C Factors affecting the first attempt success rate of intravenous cannulation in older people. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2019; 28:(11–12)2206-2213 https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14816

Zingg W., Barton A., Bitmead J., Eggimann P., Pujol M., Simon A., Tatzel J Best practice in the use of peripheral venous catheters: A scoping review and expert consensus. Infection Prevention in Practice. 2023; 5:(2) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infpip.2023.100271

Zingg W., Pittet D Peripheral venous catheters: An under-evaluated problem. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. 2009; 34:S38-S42 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-8579(09)70565-5

A randomized control trial to compare Quiet Eye training efficacy to traditional technical training with undergraduate student nurses' peripheral intravenous cannulation performance: a protocol

23 January 2025
Volume 34 · Issue 2

Abstract

Introduction:

Peripheral intravenous cannulation (PIVC) is a common and complex procedure with low first-attempt success rates, causing patient suffering and increased healthcare costs. Quiet Eye (QE) training, a gaze-focused approach, has shown promise in improving procedural PIVC skills. We will examine the effectiveness of traditional technical training (TT) and QE training (QET) on student nurse PIVC performance.

Methods:

Forty-four participants will be randomly assigned to either the TT or QET groups using a blocked randomization method to ensure balanced group sizes. Blinded outcome assessments will minimize bias. Data will be collected using a structured questionnaire and a mobile eye tracker to simultaneously record gaze and hand movements. Participants will complete pre-intervention, post-intervention, and one-week retention tests using a light-skinned manikin arm. A transfer task, utilizing a dark-skinned manikin arm, will assess participants' skills post-trials. The TT group will receive traditional instruction on hand movement improvement; the QET group will receive feedback on their gaze behaviours. The primary outcome measure will be PIVC first attempt success defined as being able to flush the inserted catheter with 10 mL (maximum) normal saline into the vessel. A trial will be considered unsuccessful if more than gentle pressure on the syringe plunger is needed to flush the catheter or if the participant abandoned the attempt before attempting the flush. Other dependent variables will be QE duration (%), number of fixations, total movement time(s), and movement phase time(s). We will analyze data with descriptive and inferential statistics, including mixed model ANOVA and Chi-Square tests.

Discussion:

This study examines the significance of improving PIVC first attempt success rates and highlights QET potential as an intervention. Emphasis is placed on critical implications for health care, particularly the importance of integrating QET into nursing education programs. Future research utilizing large-scale trials and longitudinal designs is recommended.

Most hospitalized people (70%–80%) require vascular access device placement (Alexandrou et al, 2012; Zingg and Pittet, 2009). These peripherally inserted thin plastic tubes allow venous system access for infusing essential fluids, blood, blood products, and medications. Although this common and complex skill is routinely taught in undergraduate nursing programs, peripheral intravenous cannulation (PIVC) first attempt success rates (FASRs) differ considerably between novice (23%) and expert (98%) nurses (Carr et al, 2016; Frey, 1998). When significant complications such as infection occur, increased hospital length of stay and patient's pain and suffering often result (Catarino et al, 2022; Marsh et al, 2020; Millington et al, 2020).

Several factors contribute to inexperienced registered nurses' (RNs') and student nurses' low FASRs, including the lack of appropriate evidence-based education and PIVC skill development opportunities (Gorski et al, 2021; Rodriguez-Calero et al, 2020; Yalçınlı et al, 2019). Traditionally, nurses learn PIVC utilizing the cognitive apprenticeship model and simulation (Wooley and Jarvis, 2007). However, despite widespread PIVC teaching in nursing education and calls for close examination of individual clinical differences, there has not been a significant FASR improvement (Arslan et al, 2022; Frey, 1998; Parker et al, 2017). To increase FASRs more quickly and effectively, students and RNs urgently need improved training and support (Rivaz et al, 2017).

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Nursing and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for nurses. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to clinical or professional articles

  • Unlimited access to the latest news, blogs and video content