References

A Local Authority v A (A Child) & Anor. 2010. http://bailii.org (04 May 2010)

A local authority v AB. 2020;

A local authority in Yorkshire v SF. 2020;

Cheshire West and Chester Council v P. 2014;

European convention on fundamental human rights and freedoms.Rome: Council of Europe; 1950

HL v United Kingdom (45508/99). 2005;

KW v Rochdale MBC. 2015;

Law Society. Deprivation of liberty safeguards: a practical guide. 2019. https://www.lawsociety.org.uk/topics/private-client/deprivation-of-liberty-safeguards-a-practical-guide (accessed 5 January 2021)

PCT v LDV & Others. 2013;

Liberty protection safeguards implementation delayed until April 2022. 2020. https://www.communitycare.co.uk/2020/07/16/liberty-protection-safeguards-implementation-delayed-april-2022/ (accessed 5 January 2021)

Staffordshire County Council v SRK & Ors. 2016;

Storck v Germany. 2005;

Positive obligations to protect against deprivation of liberty in the community

14 January 2021
Volume 30 · Issue 1

Abstract

Richard Griffith, Senior Lecturer in Health Law at Swansea University, discusses the positive obligation to protect vulnerable people from unauthorised deprivations of liberty in various community settings

The Government's decision to delay the law changing the procedures for authorising a deprivation of liberty to at least the spring of 2022 requires nurses to ensure that individuals who lack capacity and are cared for in community settings are not being unlawfully deprived of their liberty by using the current procedure for identifying and authorising that deprivation of liberty (Samuel, 2020).

The Mental Capacity Act 2005, section 4A, does not provide a general power to deprive a person of their liberty. A deprivation of liberty is only lawful under the 2005 Act if it is authorised by either:

The Supreme Court judgment in Cheshire West and Chester Council v P [2014] introduced an inclusive test for determining a deprivation of liberty, particularly where that person was confined in a care setting for more than a negligible period of time. The Supreme Court further held that a deprivation of liberty could arise in care settings other than hospitals and care homes such as supported living, in a shared lives arrangement or even in a person's own home.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Nursing and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for nurses. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to clinical or professional articles

  • Unlimited access to the latest news, blogs and video content