References

Expected implementation date for DOLS replacement model announced by care minister. 2019. https://tinyurl.com/y2dewsjt (accessed 9 December 2019)

Law Commission. Mental Capacity and deprivation of liberty. Summary. 2017. https://tinyurl.com/tkk3u3d (accessed 9 December 2019)

Preparing for the liberty protection safeguards

09 January 2020
Volume 29 · Issue 1

Abstract

Richard Griffith, Senior Lecturer in Health Law at Swansea University, discusses the revised framework for authorising the deprivation of liberty of a person who lacks capacity

Richard Griffith

In response to a report from the Law Commission (2017), Parliament enacted the Mental Capacity (Amendment) Act 2019, which will introduce a revised, less bureaucratic scheme to safeguard adults and young persons who are deprived of their liberty in care settings. This will replace the current deprivation of liberty safeguards under schedule A1 of the Mental Capacity Act 2005.

The 2019 Act introduces schedule AA1 to the Mental Capacity Act 2005, which makes provision for a revised scheme to authorise the deprivation of liberty of vulnerable people in any care setting. The purpose of the revised schedule is to enable the care or treatment of a cared-for person that gives rise to a deprivation of liberty and that does not conflict with any mental health arrangements the person may be subject to. The arrangements can include requiring the cared-for person to reside in a particular place or to receive care and treatment in that place. It also can include the means and manner of transport for the cared-for person to, from or between places (schedule AA1 2(3)).

In June 2019, the Care Minister gave 1 October 2020 as the implementation date for the provisions, but before then a revised code of practice and regulations that will provide the detail to operationalise the liberty protection safeguards need to be consulted on and approved by both Parliament in England and the Senedd in Wales (Haynes, 2019).

To properly prepare for the implementation of the liberty protection safeguards, it is essential that nurses become familiar with the new provisions so that they can inform the consultations on the revised code of practice and regulations and judge the impact of the revised safeguards on their practice. Nurses will also have to become familiar with the new terms set out in the revised schedule (Box 1).

Terms used by liberty protection safeguards

  • Cared-for person: A person aged 16 or over who is subject to arrangements that amount to a deprivation of liberty
  • Responsible body: Hospital manager, clinical commissioning group, local authority or local health board responsible for ensuring conditions are met and authorising the arrangements
  • Care home manager: Can provide the responsible body with a statement confirming requirements for authorisation are met in relation to an adult in the care home
  • Independent Mental Capacity Advocate (IMCA): Instructed to represent and support the cared-for person, and to receive and give information
  • Approved Mental Capacity Professional (AMCP): Carry out preauthorisation reviews where the cared-for person is objecting, they are in an independent hospital or referred
  • Appropriate person: Appointed to represent and support the cared-for person instead of an IMCA
  • Family/friends/carers/attorneys/deputies: Consulted, involved and provided with relevant information
  • Court of Protection: Provides an appeals process that enables a review of lawfulness of deprivation of liberty
  • Cared-for person

    The revised provisions will provide for an administrative system that will be able to authorise the deprivation of liberty of a cared-for person in any care setting, not just hospitals and care homes covered under the current deprivation of liberty safeguards process.

    A cared-for person for the purpose of the schedule AA1 will be someone who:

  • Is aged 16 and over
  • Lacks capacity to consent to the arrangements and
  • Has a mental disorder (as defined under section 1(2) of the Mental Health Act 1983).
  • Responsible body

    A responsible body will have a duty to authorise arrangements that amount to a deprivation of liberty if the conditions set out in schedule AA1 are met.

    In England a responsible body can be:

  • A hospital manager
  • A clinical commissioning group or
  • An English local authority.
  • In Wales a responsible body can be:

  • A hospital manager
  • A health board or
  • A Welsh local authority.
  • Duty to authorise arrangements

    The responsible body with the duty to authorise arrangements that amount to a deprivation of liberty depends on the status and care setting of the cared-for person.

    Under the provisions of the Mental Capacity Act 2005, schedule AA1 (6), the hospital manager is the responsible body where the cared-for person's arrangements are mainly in an NHS hospital. For independent hospitals, the responsible body in England is the local authority and in Wales it is the local health board. Clinical commissioning groups are the responsible body for cared-for persons subject to continuing healthcare arrangements in England whereas local health boards fulfil that role in Wales.

    For all other care settings the local authority is the responsible body.

    Right to information

    Hospital managers, clinical commissioning groups, health boards and local authorities all have a duty to publish information in a form that is accessible to a cared-for person and that includes details on:

  • Effect of authorisation
  • Process of authorisation
  • When an independent mental capacity advocate (IMCA) will be appointed
  • Role of the appropriate person
  • When an approved mental capacity professional would be involved
  • Right of appeal to a court
  • Right to review of authorisation.
  • That duty extends to ensuring that, as soon as practicable, they take practical steps to ensure that the cared-for person and any appointed appropriate person understands the arrangements and other information they have a duty to provide.

    Process of authorisation

    The process of authorisation is set out in Figure 1. Before a responsible body can authorise arrangements that amount to a deprivation of liberty, it must be satisfied that there is sufficient evidence that:

  • The cared-for person aged 16+ is subject to arrangements that amount to a deprivation of their liberty
  • Assessments show the cared-for person
  • Lacks capacity to consent to the arrangements
  • Has a mental disorder
  • Arrangements are necessary and proportionate to protect the cared-for person from harm
  • There has been a consultation to ascertain the cared-for person's wishes and feelings in relation to the arrangements with
  • The cared-for person
  • Anyone named by the cared-for person as someone to be consulted about arrangements of the kind in question
  • Anyone engaged in caring for the cared-for person or interested in the cared-for person's welfare
  • Anyone holding a lasting power of attorney or an enduring power of attorney granted by the cared-for person
  • Any deputy appointed for the cared-for person by the court
  • Any appropriate person and any IMCA concerned
  • An IMCA or an appropriate person has been appointed to represent and support the cared-for person.
  • Figure 1. The proposed process of authorising a deprivation of liberty under the liberty protection safeguards

    In the case of adults in care homes, the responsible body may ask the care home manager to provide a statement that they are satisfied they have evidence that the conditions for authorisation are met and to submit a draft authorisation record to the responsible body for them to sign.

    Preauthorisation review

    Evidence that a cared for person meets the conditions for their arrangements to be authorised will be subject to a preauthorisation review by a person from the responsible body who is not someone involved in the day-to-day care or providing treatment to the cared-for person and if satisfied they will prepare a draft authorisation record for a responsible body authoriser to sign.

    Approved mental capacity professionals

    Where the cared-for person:

  • Objects to residing in a particular place or objects to their care or treatment
  • Is mainly being treated in an independent hospital
  • Has their case referred by a responsible body.
  • Then the preauthorisation review must be undertaken by an approved mental capacity professional (AMCP). The Mental Capacity Act 2005, schedule AA1 requires every local authority in England and Wales to make arrangements for the approval of AMCPs and ensure they have sufficient numbers of AMCPs for their area.

    In undertaking a preauthorisation review AMCPs must:

  • Review the information on which the responsible body relies
  • Determine whether the authorisation conditions are met
  • Meet with the cared-for person, if appropriate and practicable to do so
  • Consult any other person or take any other action, if appropriate and practicable to do so.
  • Authorisation of a deprivation of liberty

    A responsible body can authorise a deprivation of liberty once the preauthorisation reviewer or AMCP confirms they are satisfied that the conditions are met and submit a draft authorisation record to be signed off by the responsible body authoriser.

    The document then becomes the authorisation record and will detail:

  • All arrangements authorised for the time being
  • The responsible body for that person
  • Time from which the authorisation has effect
  • When it is to cease to have effect
  • The programme for reviewing the authorisation
  • The name of the IMCA or appropriate person who has been appointed.
  • The responsible body has a duty to provide a copy of the authorisation record to the cared-for person and their IMCA or appropriate person. That duty must be discharged with 72 hours of authorisation or the responsible body must review and record why this has not happened. Responsible bodies must also take practical steps to ensure that the cared-for person and any appointed appropriate person understands the arrangements that have been authorised.

    The duration of authorisation will depend on the individual circumstances of the each cared-for person. The Mental Capacity Act 2005 schedule AA1 allows maximum authorisation periods of

  • Up to 12 months initially, then
  • Up to 12 months on first renewal, then
  • Up to 3 years on subsequent renewals.
  • Reviews of authorisation

    The responsible body must set out a programme of regular reviews for every authorisation to ensure that the arrangements continue to be necessary and proportionate and that the conditions for authorisation continue to be met.

    Responsible bodies must also hold a review under any of these circumstances:

  • Authorisation is varied
  • Reasonable request is received from an interested person
  • Cared-for person now objects to residence, care or treatment
  • Significant change in condition or circumstances
  • Cared-for person is subject to mental health arrangements or requirement.
  • Excluded arrangements

    The safeguards set out in the Mental Health Act 2005, schedule AA1 do not apply to the following mental health arrangements where the cared-for person is:

  • Detained in hospital under sections 2, 3, 4, 35, 36, 37, 38, 44, 45A, 47, 48 and 51 of the Mental Health Act (MHA) 1983
  • Subject to section 17 leave and arrangements are for enabling treatment for mental disorder in hospital
  • Subject to community treatment order (CTO) or conditional discharge and arrangements are for enabling treatment for mental disorder in hospital
  • Subject to guardianship and person objects to arrangements for enabling treatment for mental disorder in hospital and objection not overridden by the person with lasting/enduring power of attorney or deputy
  • An objecting informal patient who could be detained under section 2 or 3 of MHA 1983 and objects to arrangements enabling treatment for mental disorder in hospital and objection not overridden by the person with lasting/enduring power of attorney or deputy.
  • Arrangements under the schedule would also be excluded if they did not accord with:

  • Requirements imposed by a guardian under section 8 of MHA 1983
  • Condition of a leave of absence under section 17 of MHA 1983
  • Condition of a community treatment order under section 17A of MHA 1983
  • Condition of a conditional discharge under sections 37/41 or 73 of MHA 1983.
  • Lawful deprivation of liberty in an emergency or while awaiting authorisation

    The provisions of the Mental Capacity Act 2005, section 4B will allow a cared-for person to be lawfully deprived of their liberty without authorisation where this is necessary for the provision of life-sustaining treatment or to perform a vital act.

    Section 4B of the 2005 Act applies in an emergency or when waiting for a court or responsible body to authorise arrangements that amount to a deprivation of liberty. The 2005 Act does not impose a time limit on section 4B.

    For the purpose of section 4B a vital act is one that prevents serious deterioration in a person's condition. An emergency means there is an urgent need to give life-sustaining treatment or perform a vital act and it is not reasonably practical to wait for authorisation or detain the person under the MHA 1983.

    Revised code of practice and regulations

    Before the liberty protection safeguards can be implemented a revised Mental Capacity Act 2005 code of practice needs to be approved and regulations need to be passed by Parliament and the Senedd that set out the requirements for the operation of the safeguards.

    As Parliament could not agree a statutory definition of a deprivation of liberty, the Mental Capacity (Amendment) Act 2019 instead requires that guidance on what kinds of arrangements amount to a deprivation of liberty must be set out in the revised code of practice.

    In addition, Parliament in England and the Senedd in Wales will decide through regulations:

  • Requirements for making a determination and carrying out an assessment of capacity and mental disorder
  • Connections with a care home that exclude a person from carrying out assessments or preauthorisation reviews for care home arrangements
  • Requirements for those who can carry out determinations and assessments
  • Requirements for carrying out necessary and proportionate arrangements assessments
  • Criteria for eligibility and approval of AMCPs
  • Prescribed body to approve training of AMCPs
  • Bodies required to monitor and report the operation of the safeguards.
  • Conclusion

    Although the Mental Capacity (Amendment) Act 2019 sets out the framework for replacing the current deprivation of liberty safeguards with more streamlined and less bureaucratic safeguards, it can be seen that much of the regulation needed to implement the new safeguards is still outstanding. To achieve the planned implementation date of 1 October 2020 the regulations will have to be available for consultation and final approval in the spring of 2020 together with a revised code of practice. To ensure a meaningful consultation on the proposed regulations and code of practice it is essential nurses are familiar with the revised safeguards framework so that they can gauge their impact on practice and provide well-informed feedback before the new safeguards are adopted.

    KEY POINTS

  • The Mental Capacity (Amendment) Act 2019 will introduce a revised scheme to safeguard adults and young people who are deprived of their liberty in care settings
  • The revised scheme will replace the current deprivation of liberty safeguards
  • The regulations needed to implement the new safeguards are still outstanding
  • The target implementation date for the new safeguards is 1 October 2020