References

Ahmed J, Khan S, Lim M, Chandrasekaran TV, MacFie J. Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols—compliance and variations in practice during routine colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2012; 14:(9)1045-1051 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02856.x

Person-centered care: from ideas to action. 2014. https://tinyurl.com/yyas9fcp (accessed 11 February 2021)

Bach AM, Risoer MB, Forman A, Seibaek L. Practices and attitudes concerning endometriosis among nurses specialized in gynaecology. Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2016; https://doi.org/10.1177/2333393616651351

Basse L, Raskov HH, Hjort Jakobsen D Accelerated postoperative recovery programme after colonic resection improves physical performance, pulmonary function and body composition. Br J Surg. 2002; 89:(4)446-453 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.02044.x

Basse L, Jakobsen DH, Bardram L Functional recovery after open versus laparoscopic colonic resection: a randomized, blinded study. Ann Surg. 2005; 241:(3)416-423 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000154149.85506.36

Brower RG. Consequences of bed rest. Crit Care Med. 2009; 37:S422-S428 https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181b6e30a

Bjørn SF, Schnack TH, Lajer H Classification of ovarian cancer surgery facilitates treatment decisions in a gynecological multidisciplinary team. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2017; 27:(2)382-389 https://doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0000000000000876

Christensen T, Kehlet H. Postoperative fatigue. World J Surg. 1993; 17:(2)220-225 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01658930

Coleman MP, Forman D, Bryant H Cancer survival in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and the UK, 1995–2007 (the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership): an analysis of population-based cancer registry data. Lancet. 2011; 377:(9760)127-138 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62231-3

Convertino VA, Bloomfield SA, Greenleaf J. An overview of the issues: physiological effects of bed rest and restricted physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1997; 29:(2)187-190 https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-199702000-00004

Current Nursing. Virginia Henderson's Need Theory. 2020. https://www.currentnursing.com/nursing_theory/Henderson.html (accessed 11 February 2021)

Edwards HM, Noer MC, Sperling CD Survival of ovarian cancer patients in Denmark: results from the Danish gynaecological cancer group (DGCG) database, 1995–2012. Acta Oncol (Madr). 2016; 55:36-43 https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2016.1182641

Fagö-Olsen CL, Høgdall C, Kehlet H, Christensen IJ, Ottesen B. Centralized treatment of advanced stages of ovarian cancer improves survival: a nationwide Danish survey. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011; 90:(3)273-279 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0412.2010.01043.x

Fiore JF, Castelino T, Pecorelli N Ensuring early mobilization within an enhanced recovery program for colorectal surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2017; 266:(2)223-231 https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002114

Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Schwenk W Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations. World J Surg. 2013; 37:(2)259-284 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1772-0

Henriksen MG, Jensen MB, Hansen HV, Jespersen TW, Hessov I. Enforced mobilization, early oral feeding, and balanced analgesia improve convalescence after colorectal surgery. Nutrition. 2002; 18:(2)147-152 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-9007(01)00748-1

Hjort Jakobsen D, Sonne E, Andreasen J, Kehlet H. Convalescence after colonic surgery with fast-track vs conventional care. Colorectal Dis. 2006; 8:(8)683-687 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2006.00995.x

Hjort Jakobsen D, Rud K, Kehlet H, Egerod I. Standardising fast-track surgical nursing care in Denmark. Br J Nurs. 2014; 23:(9)471-476 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2014.23.9.471

Jeffs L, Muntlin Athlin A, Needleman J, Jackson D, Kitson A. Building the foundation to generate a fundamental care standardised data set. J Clin Nurs. 2018; 27:(11-12)2481-2488 https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14308

Kalisch BJ, Lee S, Dabney BW. Outcomes of inpatient mobilization: a literature review. J Clin Nurs. 2014; 23:(11-12)1486-1501 https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12315

Kehlet H. Fast-track surgery—an update on physiological care principles to enhance recovery. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2011; 396:(5)585-590 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-011-0790-y

Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery. Ann Surg. 2008; 248:(2)189-198 https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31817f2c1a

Kehoe S. Treatments for gynaecological cancers. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2006; 20:(6)985-1000 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2006.06.006

Lassen K, Soop M, Nygren J Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Group recommendations. Arch Surg. 2009; 144:(10)961-969 https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2009.170

Lindemann K, Kok PS, Stockler M, Jaaback K, Brand A. Enhanced recovery after surgery for advanced ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2017; 27:(6)1274-1282 https://doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0000000000000981

Ljungqvist O, Scott M, Fearon KC. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery. JAMA Surg. 2017; 152:(3)292-298 https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4952

Lu D, Wang X, Shi G. Perioperative enhanced recovery programmes for gynaecological cancer patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; 19:(3) https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008239.pub4

Marx C, Rasmussen T, Hjort Jakobsen D The effect of accelerated rehabilitation on recovery after surgery for ovarian malignancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006; 85:(4)488-492 https://doi.org/10.1080/00016340500408325

Marx C, Bendixen A, Høgdall C, Ottosen C, Kehlet H, Ottesen B. Organisation and quality of primary surgical intervention for ovarian cancer in Denmark. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007; 86:(12)1496-1502 https://doi.org/10.1080/00016340701622294

Nelson G, Bakkum-Gamez J, Kalogera E Guidelines for perioperative care in gynecologic/oncology: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society recommendations—2019 update. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019; 29:(4)651-668 https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2019-000356

Pedersen CB. The Danish Civil Registration System. Scand J Public Health. 2011; 39:22-25 https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494810387965

Rønfeldt LL, Hjort Jakobsen D, Kehlet H, Lipczak H, Wennervaldt K. A nationwide study of the quality of surgical guidelines and written patient information. Dan Med J. 2018; 65:(6)

Sackett DL, Rosenberg WMC, Gray JAM, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ. 1996; 312:(7023)71-72 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71

Seibaek L, Blaakaer J, Petersen LK, Hounsgaard L. Ovarian cancer surgery: health and coping during the perioperative period. Support Care Cancer. 2013; 21:(2)575-582 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-012-1556-y

Seibaek L, Delmar C, Hounsgaard L. Sustaining hope and life courage in patients undergoing ovarian cancer surgery—the impact of care. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2018a; 27:(1) https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12562

Seibæk L, Jakobsen DH, Høgdall C. The Danish Gynecological Cancer Nursing Database: creating evidence for quality improvements in preoperative and postoperative cancer care. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2018b; 28:(4)802-807 https://doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0000000000001220

Smart NJ, White P, Allison AS, Ockrim JB, Kennedy RH, Francis NK. Deviation and failure of enhanced recovery after surgery following laparoscopic colorectal surgery: early prediction model. Colorectal Dis. 2012; 14:(10)e727-e734 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.03096.x

Sørensen S, Bjørn S, Jochumsen K Danish Gynecological Cancer Database. Clin Epidemiol. 2016; 8:485-490 https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S99479

Taylor MJ, McNicholas C, Nicolay C, Darzi A, Bell D, Reed JE. Systematic review of the application of the plan–do–study–act method to improve quality in healthcare. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014; 23:(4)290-298 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2013-001862

Vlug MS, Wind J, Hollmann MW Laparoscopy in combination with fast track multimodal management is the best perioperative strategy in patients undergoing colonic surgery: a randomized clinical trial (LAFA-study). Ann Surg. 2011; 254:(6)868-875 https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31821fd1ce

van der Leeden M, Huijsmans R, Geleijn E Early enforced mobilisation following surgery for gastrointestinal cancer: feasibility and outcomes. Physiotherapy. 2016; 102:(1)103-110 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2015.03.3722

Wolk S, Meißner T, Linke S Use of activity tracking in major visceral surgery—the Enhanced Perioperative Mobilization (EPM) trial: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2017; 18:(1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-1782-1

Zargar-Shoshtari K, Paddison JS, Booth RJ, Hill AG. A prospective study on the influence of a fast-track program on postoperative fatigue and functional recovery after major colonic surgery. J Surg Res. 2009; 154:(2)330-335 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2008.06.023

Postoperative mobilisation as an indicator for the quality of surgical nursing care

25 February 2021
16 min read
Volume 30 · Issue 4

Abstract

Background:

Postoperative mobilisation is an important part of fundamental care. Increased mobilisation has positive effect on recovery, but immobilisation is still a challenge in postoperative care.

Aims:

To report how the establishment of a national nursing database was used to measure postoperative mobilisation in patients undergoing surgery for ovarian cancer.

Methods:

‘Mobilisation’ was defined as at least 3 hours out of bed on postoperative day 1, with the goal set at achieving this in 60% of patients. Data entry was performed by clinical nurses on 4400 patients with ovarian cancer.

Findings:

46.7% of patients met the goal for mobilisation on the first postoperative day, but variations in duration and type of mobilisation were observed. Of those mobilised, 51.8% had been walking in the hallway.

Conclusions:

A national nursing database creates opportunities to optimise fundamental care. By comparing nursing data with oncological, surgical and pathology data it became possible to study mobilisation in relation to cancer stage, comorbidity, treatment and extent of surgery.

Postoperative mobilisation is an important aspect of fundamental postoperative care. The effect and importance of mobilisation is well documented in the literature (Kehlet and Wilmore, 2008;Van der Leeden et al, 2016), but inadequate mobilisation still represents a challenge for daily practice in surgical departments. In this article the authors describe how the establishment of a national nursing database was used to measure and define sufficient postoperative mobilisation in patients undergoing ovarian cancer surgery. The discussion will primarily focus on postoperative mobilisation, because there is evidence of the positive impact of early enforced mobilisation on postoperative patient recovery (Henriksen et al, 2002; Kehlet, 2011). Despite this evidence, postoperative mobilisation is still an area that patients and nurses in surgical units struggle with, and where clinical audits demonstrate problems (Ahmed et al, 2012; Fiore et al, 2017). Some of the reasons for this are organisational, such as lack of care plans for mobilisation and staffing levels. Furthermore, staff members must be dedicated to mobilisation and, in addition, clinical issues such as pain, hypotension and fatigue may have a negative impact on patients' mobilisation. Therefore, insufficient postoperative mobilisation demonstrates multifactorial challenges in fundamental care, which must be focused on and improved in future clinical practice as well as in clinical guidelines.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Nursing and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for nurses. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to clinical or professional articles

  • Unlimited access to the latest news, blogs and video content