References

3M Health Care. 3M Tegaderm PICC/CVC securement device + IV. Advanced securement dressing. Product description. 2016. https://tinyurl.com/4csuakxp (accessed 6 April 2021)

Czaplewski L. Clinician and patient education, 3rd edn. In: Alexander M, Corrigan A, Gorski L, Hankins J, Perucca R (eds). St Louis: Saunders Elsevier; 2010

How much does an ER visit cost? Consumer Health Ratings (online). 2019. https://consumerhealthratings.com/how-much-does-er-visit-cost/ (accessed 6 April 2021)

Ethicon Inc. Biopatch® protective disk with CHG. 2019. https://tinyurl.com/s4bctb5j (accessed 6 April 2021)

Gorski LA, Hadaway L, Hagle ME Infusion therapy standards of practice. J Infus Nurs. 2021; 44:(1S)S1-S224 https://doi.org/10.1097/NAN.0000000000000396

Huang V, Ruhe JJ, Lerner P, Fedorenko M. Risk factors for readmission in patients discharged with outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2018; 19:(1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s40360-018-0240-3

Interrad Medical Inc. SecurAcath placement and removal procedure. 2021. https://securacath.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Placement-and-Removal-1329-007-Rev-L.pdf (accessed 6 April 2021)

Macklin D, Blackburn PL. Central venous catheter securement: using the healthcare and technology synergy model to take a closer look. Journal of the Association for Vascular Access. 2015; 20:(1)45-50 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.java.2014.10.011

Rowe MS, Arnold K, Spencer TR. Catheter securement impact on PICC-related CLABSI: a university hospital perspective. Am J Infect Control. 2020; 48:(12)1497-1500 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2020.06.178

Turner MS, Hankins J. Pharmacology, 3rd edn. In: Alexander M, Corrigan A, Gorski L, Hankins J, Perucca R (eds). St Louis: Saunders Elsevier; 2010

Ullman AJ, Cooke M, Rickard CM. Examining the role of securement and dressing products to prevent central venous access device failure: a narrative review. Journal of the Association for Vascular Access. 2015; 20:(2)99-110 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.java.2015.03.001

Vidal E, Sharathkumar A, Glover J, Faustino EV. Central venous catheter-related thrombosis and thromboprophylaxis in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thromb Haemost. 2014; 12:(7)1096-1109 https://doi.org/10.1111/jth.12598

Zhao H, He Y, Wei Q, Ying Y. Medical adhesive related skin injury prevalence at the peripherally inserted central catheter insertion site: a cross-sectional, multiple-center study. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2018; 45:(1)22-25 https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0000000000000394

Zulkowski K. Understanding moisture-associated skin damage, medical adhesive-related skin injuries and skin tears. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2017; 30:(8)372-381 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ASW.0000521048.64537.6e

Vascular access device securement for oncology patients and those with chronic diseases

22 April 2021
7 min read
Volume 30 · Issue 8

Abstract

This article presents three case studies, each discussing securement issues as they relate to the use of long-term vascular access devices from the perspectives of the clinician and the patient. The choice of securement should be weighed against the patient's activity level, duration of the line placement, infection risks and inevitable skin irritation caused by repeated replacement of adhesive securement. Living with a chronic illness requiring frequent infusions is difficult enough—worrying about the device being dislodged should not be an additional stressor.

When contending with a cancer diagnosis or chronic illness, the patient's journey is fraught with obstacles that must be overcome. Each day, attempting to navigate such obstacles requires the ability to manage the illness, the treatment, and the effects of both. Adding unnecessary trips to the emergency department (ED), skin breakdown and anxiety about the security of the vascular access device (VAD) may all cause added distress for the patient.

VADs are often a lifeline for the delivery of chemotherapeutic agents, medications, nutritional requirements or antimicrobial infusions (Turner and Hankins, 2010). Having the right VAD placed is the first collaborative decision between the patient, physician and their vascular access specialist. Keeping the VAD secure, preserving skin integrity and reducing risk of infection should be equally important, but the choice of device is often determined by traditional procedural practice or clinical convenience (Czaplewski, 2010).

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Nursing and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for nurses. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to clinical or professional articles

  • Unlimited access to the latest news, blogs and video content