References

Benezech A, Bouvier M, Vitton V. Faecal incontinence: Current knowledge and perspectives. World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol. 2016; 7:(1)59-71 https://doi.org/10.4291/wjgp.v7.i1.59

Duelund-Jakobsen J, Worsoe J, Lundby L, Christensen P, Krogh K. Management of patients with faecal incontinence. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2016; 9:(1)86-97 https://doi.org/10.1177/1756283X15614516

Emmanuel A, Collins B, Henderson M, Lewis L, Stackhouse K. Development of a decision guide for transanal irrigation in bowel disorders. Gastrointestinal Nursing. 2019; 17:(7)24-30 https://doi.org/10.12968/gasn.2019.17.7.24

International Continence Society. Fact sheets. A background to urinary and faecal incontinence. 2015. https://tinyurl.com/5vopw4h6 (accessed 15 February 2021)

McClurg D, Jamieson K, Hagen S, Cheater F, Eustice S, Burke J. Improving continence education for nurses. Nurs Times. 2013; 109:(4)16-18

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Management of faecal incontinence in adults. Clinical guideline CG49. 2007. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg49 (accessed 15 February 2021)

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Peristeen transanal irrigation system for managing bowel dysfunction. Medical technologies guidance MTG36. 2018. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/mtg36 (accessed 15 February 2021)

NHS England. Excellence in continence care: Practical guidance for commissioners, and leaders in health and social care. 2018. https://tinyurl.com/vfjl6pyk (accessed 15 February 2021)

Royal College of Nursing. Bowel care. Management of lower bowel dysfunction, including digital rectal examination and digital removal of faeces. 2019. https://tinyurl.com/10qrj9ho (accessed 15 February 2021)

Fecal incontinence. Fecal incontinence. 2020. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459128/

United Kingdom Continence Society. Minimum standards for continence care in the United Kingdom. Report of the Continence Care steering group 2014. 2015. https://tinyurl.com/4rjvr9qy (accessed 15 February 2021)

Faecal incontinence: a healthcare taboo

25 February 2021
6 min read
Volume 30 · Issue 4

Faecal incontinence (FI) is one of the most taboo conditions in healthcare. It is a topic that is unlikely to be raised by individuals and may be avoided by health professionals. For those who experience FI, it is a devastating condition that can result in depression, social isolation, financial burden and skin breakdown. It is also associated with secondary morbidities and disabilities and has negative effects on a person's quality of life (International Continence Society (ICS), 2015).

People with FI describe spending considerable time and attention planning for accidents, avoiding situations where accidents might occur and the extreme anxiety that these unpredictable events generate (ICS, 2015). The ICS (2015) also identified that FI has serious consequences for sufferers by affecting their self-esteem and body image and creating feelings of shame and embarrassment, which can then impact on all aspects of their life. This is supported by Duelund-Jakobsen et al (2016), who added that FI reduces a person's ability to work and impacts their sexuality as they worry about odours and accidents during intimacy.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Nursing and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for nurses. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to clinical or professional articles

  • Unlimited access to the latest news, blogs and video content