References

UKSC 67. 2013;

EWHC 365. 2003;

EWHC 2525 (Fam). 2009;

EWCOP 39. 2021;

EWCOP 12. 2016;

Re PA 10 WLUK 29. 2020;

Fam 304. 1999;

EWCOP 60. 2015;

Identifying factors of magnetic importance

05 June 2025

Abstract

Richard Griffith, Senior Lecturer in Health Law at Swansea University, discusses how best interests decisions under the Mental Capacity Act 2005 are influenced by the factors of magnetic importance arising from the

Nurses are often required to make decisions on behalf of vulnerable people who lack capacity under the provisions of the Mental Capacity Act 2005, which states that the nurse has a duty to act in the person's best interest should their capacity be diminished. For decisions relating to care and treatment, nurses have a general authority to act and are given protection against litigation by the act.

This applies on the basis that they take reasonable steps to establish that the person lacks capacity in relation to a matter concerning their care or treatment, and that the nurse reasonably considers that the person lacks capacity and that their actions are in the person's best interest.

It is essential both for the person and the nurse that the processes for determining the best interests of a patient who lacks capacity is correctly applied.

The Mental Capacity Act 2005 does not define ‘best interests’. Instead, it provides nurses with a checklist of factors to be considered when determining the best interests of a person in their care. These factors establish a process that put the person at the centre of decision-making and reflect their individual circumstances.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Nursing and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for nurses. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to clinical or professional articles

  • Unlimited access to the latest news, blogs and video content