References
An exploration of men's experiences of learning intermittent self-catheterisation with a silicone catheter
Abstract
Intermittent self-catheterisation (ISC) is the method of choice for men with lower urinary tract symptoms who need to drain retained urine from the bladder. It is preferred to using an indwelling urinary catheter as it has lower risks of complications and catheter-associated urinary tract infection. Learning ISC can be challenging for men initially but, with the support of knowledgeable nurses experienced in teaching ISC, the technique can be learned, accepted and normalised, improving symptom control and quality of life. This paper discusses the results of a survey exploring men's experiences of learning ISC with the Hydrosil Go™ (C.R. Bard Inc—now part of Becton, Dickinson and Company) silicone catheter and to highlight issues important to men when learning and living with ISC. The survey collected data from four countries: UK, France, Netherlands and Italy. It aims to help nurses who teach ISC and inform them to discuss what matters to men when learning and living with ISC.
Urinary catheters are commonly employed in healthcare and have been used to drain poorly emptying bladders for 3500 years (Community Matters, 2019). A quarter of patients admitted to hospital are catheterised but this is not necessary in all cases, and catheters may not get removed before discharge (Community Matters, 2019). ISC is considered the best alternative to an indwelling urinary catheter as it has a lower risk of catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) and minimises harm from catheter-related complications (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), 2012). It should be further promoted to reduce the prevalence and over-reliance of indwelling catheter use.
ISC is defined as a person passing a catheter into their bladder to drain urine, then removing the catheter when the urine has been drained. The process of clean intermittent self-catheterisation was introduced by Lapides et al (1972) and found to be a safe, clinically effective alternative to an indwelling catheter in the management of neuropathic bladders. ISC is also believed to be more physiologically normal and acceptable (McConville, 2002) than continuous bladder drainage with a permanent indwelling catheter, as it allows the bladder to fill and empty completely (Barton, 2000; Rigby, 2005).
Register now to continue reading
Thank you for visiting British Journal of Nursing and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for nurses. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:
What's included
-
Limited access to clinical or professional articles
-
Unlimited access to the latest news, blogs and video content