References

Christensen P, Andreasen J, Ehlers L. Cost-effectiveness of transanal irrigation versus conservative bowel management for spinal cord injury patients. Spinal Cord. 2009; 47:(2)138-143 https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2008.98

Christensen P, Krogh K, Perrouin-Verbe B Global audit on bowel perforations related to transanal irrigation. Tech Coloproctol. 2016; 20:(2)109-915 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-015-1400-8

Doyle D. Per rectum: a history of enemata. J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2005; 35:(4)367-370

Duelund–Jakobsen J, Worsoe J, Lundby L, Christensen P, Krough K. Management of patients with faecal incontinence. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2016; 9:(1)86-97 https://doi.org/10.1177/1756283X15614516

Emmanuel A. Review of the efficacy and safety of transanal irrigation for neurogenic bowel dysfunction. Spinal Cord. 2010; 48:(9)664-673 https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2010.5

Emmanuel AV, Krogh K, Bazzocchi G Consensus review of best practice of transanal irrigation in adults. Spinal Cord. 2013; 51:(10)732-738 https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2013.86

Emmanuel A, Collins B, Henderson M, Lewis L, Stackhouse K. Development of a decision guide for transanal irrigation in bowel disorders. Gastrointestinal Nursing. 2019; 17:(7)24-30 https://doi.org/10.12968/gasn.2019.17.7.24

Emmett CD, Close HJ, Yiannakou Y, Mason JM. Trans-anal irrigation therapy to treat adult chronic functional constipation: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Gastroenterol. 2015; 5 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-015-0354-7

Henderson M, Tinkler L, Yiannakou Y. Transanal irrigation as a treatment for bowel dysfunction. Gastrointestinal Nursing. 2018; 6:(4)26-34 https://doi.org/10.12968/gasn.2018.16.4.26

Kim HR, Lee BS, Lee JE, Shin HI. Application of transanal irrigation for patients with spinal cord injury in South Korea: a 6-month follow-up study. Spinal Cord. 2013; 51:(5)389-394 https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2012.171

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Peristeen transanal irrigation system for managing bowel dysfunction. Medical technologies guidance MTG36. 2018. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/mtg36 (accessed 27 March 2020)

Wilson M. A review of transanal irrigation in adults. Br J Nurs. 2017; 26:(15)846-856 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2017.26.15.846

Yates A. Transanal irrigation: an alternative therapy for bowel dysfunction?. British Journal of Nursing. 2019; 28:(7)426-428 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2019.28.7.426

Transanal irrigation: is it the magic intervention for bowel management in individuals with bowel dysfunction?

09 April 2020
Volume 29 · Issue 7

Abstract

Historically, the use of colonic irrigation or transanal irrigation (TAI) has been viewed as an alternative therapy for the treatment of a wide variety of conditions not relating to bowel dysfunction, including nausea, fatigue, depression, headache, anxiety and rheumatism. However, these days it is viewed as an effective treatment in individuals who may present with bowel dysfunction and related symptoms of constipation and faecal incontinence. Such individuals would include people with neuropathic bowel disorders, conditions that affect sphincter control or bowel motility disorders. injury to the rectum, sphincter or bowel, slow transit times, evacuation difficulties or prolapse due to a weak/damaged pelvic floor, and chronic faecal incontinence. TAI may be performed by the person with bowel dysfunction, or by a carer or health professional. An individual's ability to use a device to undertake the procedure will be influenced by a range of factors, which are explored in this article.

Transanal irrigation (TAI) is the insertion of tepid tap water (36-38°C) (Henderson et al, 2018) into the lower bowel using either a rectal catheter or a cone device. It is usually self-administered by the individual or performed by a carer or health professional. The procedure has also been referred to as rectal irrigation or as bowel washouts. It has recently been approved by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) (2018) as a form of bowel treatment in individuals who suffer bowel dysfunction of either constipation or faecal incontinence.

Although it may be a relatively new intervention for bowel dysfunction, anal irrigation itself is an old concept. The Roman writer Pliny the Elder (AD23-79) recorded that the ancient Egyptians are believed to have watched and learnt from the sacred ibis who used its long beak to insert water into its anus to wash out decaying material (Doyle, 2005; Yates, 2019). The sacred ibis was associated with their god of wisdom, Thoth, who was said to have devised the use of enemas to relieve bowel problems. TAI has been used over the centuries to treat a long list of symptoms, including nausea, fatigue, depression, headache, anxiety, rheumatism and constipation, and it has been used as a ritual and part of the modern social phenomenon of colonic irrigation (Doyle, 2005; Yates 2019). Individuals who may present with bowel dysfunction would include people with neuropathic bowel disorders, such as multiple sclerosis, spinal injuries, spina bifida, Parkinson's and other conditions that affect sphincter control or bowel motility disorders. Bowel dysfunction can also include injury to the rectum, sphincter or bowel, slow transit times, evacuation difficulties or prolapse due to a weak/damaged pelvic floor (Emmanuel et al, 2013), and chronic faecal incontinence (NICE, 2018). However, there are numerous factors that may influence an individual's ability to use the device as a clinical treatment option. These factors are discussed in this article.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Nursing and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for nurses. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to clinical or professional articles

  • Unlimited access to the latest news, blogs and video content