References

Action Against Medical Accidents (AvMA) Case studies. 2021. https://www.avma.org.uk/patient-stories/case-studies/ (accessed 1 September 2021)

Chief Medical Officer. Making Amends: A consultation paper setting out proposals for reforming the approach to clinical negligence in the NHS. 2003. https://tinyurl.com/3jj82v2p (accessed 1 September 2021)

Health and Social Care Committee. The safety of maternity services in England. 2021. https://tinyurl.com/38ym2dky (accessed 1 September 2021)

Abolishing personal injury law. 2018. https://tinyurl.com/88pxvb4x (accessed 1 September 2021)

No-fault compensation for clin neg on ministers' agenda. 2021. https://bit.ly/3e5ZPAM (accessed 1 September 2021)

Learning from Bristol: The report of the Public Inquiry into children's heart surgery at the Bristol Royal Infirmary 1984-1995. 2001. https://tinyurl.com/bp86yfne (accessed 1 September 2021)

Ministry of Justice. Pre-action protocol for the resolution of clinical disputes. 2017. https://tinyurl.com/9kwu7hmz (accessed 1 September 2021)

National Audit Office. Managing the costs of clinical negligence in trusts. 2017. https://tinyurl.com/twt42a68 (accessed 1 September 2021)

Battle fatigue. 2021. https://tinyurl.com/uhw3uppj (accessed 1 September 2021)

NHS Resolution. Mediation in healthcare claims: an evaluation. 2020. https://tinyurl.com/9y9c7ak3 (accessed 1 September 2021)

NHS Resolution. Annual report and accounts 2020/21. 2021. https://tinyurl.com/k2kmmbcb (accessed 1 September 2021)

In defense of deterrence. 2011. http://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/facsch_lawrev/294 (accessed 1 September 2021)

Scottish Government. No fault compensation. 2017. https://tinyurl.com/yx59y8r5 (accessed 1 September 2021)

Compensating for clinical negligence: the need to go back to basics

09 September 2021
6 min read
Volume 30 · Issue 16

Abstract

John Tingle, Lecturer in Law, Birmingham Law School, University of Birmingham, discusses several reports looking at how our clinical negligence compensation system operates, and possible reform of this

Currently our adversarial, tort-based clinical negligence compensation system is being reviewed by the Government with a view to reform (Hyde, 2021). This review will raise some fundamental issues such as the nature and purpose of the system. What are and what should be the underlying objectives of the system? How do we deal with competing interests and which, if any, should prevail?

In considering clinical negligence reform today it is important that the reviewers do not try to reinvent the wheel and fail to consider the seminal reports of the past, which can make an immense contribution to the debate.

With clinical negligence litigation today, there is a much more cooperative, ‘cards on the table’ approach than formerly. As NHS Resolution annual reports show us each year, most clinical negligence cases do not proceed to trial and are settled without going to court—mediation and alternative dispute resolution methods are used (NHS Resolution, 2020). NHS Resolution (2021) points out that in 2020/21, of 299 mediated cases, 77% were settled on the day mediation took place or within 28 days. Of 15 674 claims settled, 74.7% were settled without any formal court proceedings, an increase on 71.5% in 2019/20 (NHS Resolution, 2021: 18). NHS Resolution states that the increase in the number of claims settling without court proceedings is due to efforts to avoid the need for court proceedings, and also notes that the response to the COVID-19 pandemic led to ‘a spirit of co-operation in our work with claimant solicitors’ (NHS Resolution, 2021: 18).

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Nursing and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for nurses. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to clinical or professional articles

  • Unlimited access to the latest news, blogs and video content