Bar Council. Written evidence, NHS litigation reform (NLR0069). 2021. (accessed 17 May 2022)

Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee. 1957;

Health and Social Care Committee. NHS litigation reform. Thirteenth report of session 2021–22. 2022. (accessed 17 May 2022)

Hempsons Solicitors. Written evidence, NHS litigation reform (NLR0014). 2021. (accessed 17 May 2022)

Herring J. Medical law and ethics, 8th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2020

Government ‘looking carefully’ at radical clin neg proposals. 2022. (accessed 17 May 2022)

Roe and Woolley v Ministry of Health. 1954;

Debating the best way to compensate patients for clinical negligence

26 May 2022
Volume 31 · Issue 10


John Tingle, Lecturer in Law, Birmingham Law School, University of Birmingham, unpicks the report from the Health and Social Care Committee on changes to the system for compensating patients who have been harmed

The debate about the best way to compensate patients for the negligence of health professionals is hotting up. The House of Commons Select Committee on Health and Social Care, chaired by former Health Secretary, Jeremy Hunt, has recently published its report on NHS litigation reform (Health and Social Care Committee (HSCC), 2022). This has produced a radical set of proposals that, if adopted, would fundamentally change our clinical negligence compensation system. Among the oral and written evidence submitted by experts, patients and other stakeholders involved in litigation we can see divergent and controversial views on the efficacy of our current tort-based system.

When viewing the recommendations, it is important to guard against a purely economic perspective of the issues. The report clearly echoes the concerns of many that something must be done about the rising cost of clinical negligence in the NHS (Hyde, 2022). I agree, but at the same time, patients have been injured by those who were meant to care for them. It is important not to prejudice their right to sue based on the economics of the NHS and to maintain a balanced perspective on the issues. Rising costs are an acute issue but the reasons for the increase are many and cannot seemingly be laid solely at the door of lawyers and the adversarial nature of our tort compensation system.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Nursing and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for nurses. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to clinical or professional articles

  • Unlimited access to the latest news, blogs and video content