References

American Nurses Association. Nursing: Scope and Standards of Practice. 2021. https://tinyurl.com/2crxmdrm (accessed 27 February 2023)

Anderson C, Moxham L, Broadbent M. Is provision of professional development by RNs to nursing students a choice?. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2018; 35:(4)34-41

Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2005; 8 https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616

Arnott J. Liberating new talents: an innovative pre-registration community-focused adult nursing programme. Br J Community Nurs. 2010; 15:(11)561-565 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjcn.2010.15.11.79626

Australian Nursing and Midwifery Accreditation Council. Registered nurse. Accreditation standards 2019. 2019. https://tinyurl.com/3yy2srrb (accessed 27 February 2023)

Campbell J. A literature/evidence review: exploration on new models and approaches to providing practice placements in mental health branch programmes.Edinburgh: NHS Education for Scotland; 2008

Canadian Association of Schools of Nursing. National Nursing Education Framework. 2022. https://tinyurl.com/3kfyr2r3 (accessed 27 February 2023)

Canadian Nurses Association. Framework for registered nurse prescribing in Canada. 2015. https://tinyurl.com/2p8k7k3v (accessed 23 February 2023)

Craig PL, Barnard A, Glasgow N, May E. Evaluating the Health “Hubs and Spokes” interprofessional placements in rural New South Wales, Australia. J Allied Health. 2014; 43:(3)176-183

Data Bridge Market Research. Global nursing education market 2020 analysis by regional, outlook, competitive landscape strategies and forecast 2027. 2022. https://tinyurl.com/24f2xxt2 (accessed 23 February 2023)

Department of Health and Social Care. Integration and innovation: working together to improve health and social care for all. 2021. https://tinyurl.com/3kh8p6ad (accessed 22 February 2023)

East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust. Hub & spoke: planned associated learning. 2023. https://www.rcn.org.uk/professional-development/practice-based-learning/innovations-from-around-the-uk (accessed 23 February 2023)

Elrod JK, Fortenberry JL The hub-and-spoke organization design: an avenue for serving patients well. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017; 17:(S1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2341-x

Heath S, Wilcox R, Leonelli S. Student nurses in the primary care network: a pilot. Practice Nursing. 2021; 32:(3)102-106 https://doi.org/10.12968/pnur.2021.32.3.102

Hong QN, Fàbregues S, Bartlett G The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers. Education for Information. 2018; 34:(4)285-291 https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-180221

Humphries B, Keeley S, Stainer L, Watson A. An alternative placement model for nursing students: discovering new horizons. British Journal of Healthcare Management. 2020; 26:(5)138-143 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjhc.2020.0012

Kruger BJ, Roush C, Olinzock BJ, Bloom K. Engaging nursing students in a long-term relationship with a home-base community. J Nurs Educ. 2010; 49:(1)10-16 https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20090828-07

Lin MH, Kawasaki A. Where to enter in hub-spoke airline networks. Papers in Regional Science. 2012; 91:(2)419-436 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2011.00386.x

McCallum J, Lamont D, Kerr EL. First year undergraduate nursing students and nursing mentors: an evaluation of their experience of specialist areas as their hub practice learning environment. Nurse Educ Pract. 2016; 16:(1)182-187 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2015.06.005

Markowski M, Bower H, Essex R, Yearley C. Peer learning and collaborative placement models in health care: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis of the literature. J Clin Nurs. 2021; 30:(11-12)1519-1541 https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15661

Millar L. Use of Hub and Spoke model in nursing students’ practice learning. Nurs Stand. 2014; 28:(49)37-42 https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.28.49.37.e861

Millar L, Conlon M, McGirr D. Students’ perspectives of using the hub and spoke model to support and develop learning in practice. Nurs Stand. 2017; 32:(9)41-49 https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.2017.e10389

Miller E, Cooper S. A registered nurse in 20 weeks?. Aust Nurs Midwifery J. 2016; 24:(1)

NHS England/NHS Improvement. The NHS Long Term Plan. 2019. https://tinyurl.com/y6dzmk2o (accessed 22 February 2023)

NHS website. How to become a nurse. 2023. https://tinyurl.com/2p89fsvr (accessed 22 February 2023)

Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia. Registered nurse standards for practice. 2016. https://tinyurl.com/baam5sej (accessed 22 February 2023)

Nursing and Midwifery Council. Standards of proficiency for preregistration nursing education. 2004. https://tinyurl.com/5hcrjhu2 (accessed 23 February 2023)

Nursing and Midwifery Council. Realising professionalism: standards for education and training. Part 3: standards for pre-registration nursing programmes. 2018a. http://tinyurl.com/yaale26c (accessed 23 February 2023)

Nursing and Midwifery Council. The code: professional standards of practice and behaviour for nurses, midwives and nursing associates. 2018b. https://tinyurl.com/gozgmtm (accessed 23 February 2023)

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2021; 10:(1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4

Hub-and-spoke dispensing models for community pharmacies in Europe. 2021. https://tinyurl.com/5xywjrrb (accessed 23 February 2023)

The development, implementation and evaluation of demonstration projects of new approaches to providing practice placements in the pre registration nursing programmes: contemporising practice placements for undergraduate student nurses: Are ‘hub and spoke’ models the future?. 2011. https://tinyurl.com/4zfautca (accessed 23 February 2023)

Roxburgh M. Undergraduate student nurses’ perceptions of two practice learning models: a focus group study. Nurse Educ Today. 2014; 34:(1)40-46 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.02.017

Roxburgh M, Conlon M, Banks D. Evaluating Hub and Spoke models of practice learning in Scotland, UK: A multiple case study approach. Nurse Educ Today. 2012; 32:(7)782-789 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2012.05.004

Thomas M, Westwood N. Student experience of hub and spoke model of placement allocation - An evaluative study. Nurse Educ Today. 2016; 46:24-28 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.08.019

Tong A, Flemming K, McInnes E, Oliver S, Craig J. Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012; 12:(1) https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-12-181

Universities and Colleges Admissions Service. Nursing applications soar as UCAS publishes latest undergraduate applicant analysis. 2021. https://tinyurl.com/bdftkxn6 (accessed 22 February 2023)

White KH, King E. Hub and spoke model for nursing student placements in the UK. Nurs Child Young People. 2015; 27:(2)24-29 https://doi.org/10.7748/ncyp.27.2.24.e547

Workforce Development

Student

A systematic scoping review of undergraduate nursing hub-and-spoke placement models

09 March 2023

Professional

02 March 2023

Volume 32 · Issue 5

ISSN (print): 0966-0461

ISSN (online): 2052-2819

Abstract

Background:

While nursing education has been forecast to continue to grow, placement capacity is now the key factor precluding growth in supply.

Aims:

To provide a comprehensive understanding of hub-and-spoke placements and their ability to increase placement capacity.

Method:

A systematic scoping review and narrative synthesis were used (Arksey and O'Malley, 2005). PRISMA checklist and ENTREQ reporting guidelines were followed.

Findings:

The search returned 418 results. After a first and second screen 11 papers were included. Results suggest that hub-and-spoke models were generally evaluated favourably by nursing students, with a range of benefits reported. However, many of the studies included in the review were small and of low quality.

Conclusion:

Given the exponential increase in applications to study nursing, hub-and-spoke placements appear to have the potential to better meet these increased demands, while also providing a number of benefits.

Clinical placements are an essential element of all pre-qualifying healthcare programmes. In the UK, nursing and midwifery placements currently account for 50% of programme hours, equating to 2300 hours of clinical placement during training (Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC), 2018a). Internationally, there is evident variation in the number of hours allotted to practice learning. Nursing students in Australia and Canada undertake 800 hours (Australian Nursing and Midwifery Accreditation Council, 2019; Canadian Association of Schools of Nursing, 2022), in South Africa they undertake 2800 hours, while in New Zealand they undertake between 1100 and 1500 hours (Miller and Cooper, 2016). Many countries (Australia, Canada, Finland, USA, the UK) have included completion of these placement hours in their requirements for registration (American Nurses Association, 2021; Canadian Nurses Association, 2015; Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia, 2016; Anderson et al, 2018; NMC, 2018b).

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Nursing and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for nurses. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

Limited access to clinical or professional articles
Unlimited access to the latest news, blogs and video content

Or continue by

Signing in with your registered email address

Clinical placement

Nurse placement

Nurse training

Hub and spoke