References

Baxter P, Jack S. Qualitative case study methodology: study design and implementation for novice researchers. Qual Rep.. 2010; 13:(4)544-559

Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol.. 2006; 3:(2)77-101 https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Halliday S, Hunter DJ, McMillan L. Ward staff perceptions of the role of the advanced nurse practitioner in a ‘hospital at day’ setting. Br J Nurs.. 2018; 27:(2)92-97 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2018.27.2.92

Reshaping the workforce to deliver the care patients need. 2016. http://www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/publications/reshaping-the-workforce (accessed 21 July 2020)

McKeag N, Fenton P. Developing the role of the inpatient advanced nurse practitioner (abstract NP021 from 43rd Annual Meeting of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, France). Bone Marrow Transplant. 2017; 52 https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2017.136

NHS England. Multi-professional framework for advanced clinical practice in England. 2017. https://tinyurl.com/yc9scy5w (accessed 21 July 2020)

Ormond-Walshe SE, Newham RA. Comparing and contrasting the clinical nurse specialist and the advanced nurse practitioner roles. J Nurs Manag.. 2001; 9:(4)205-207 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0966-0429.2001.00277.277.x

Pearce C, Breen B. Advanced clinical practice and nurse-led clinics: a time to progress. Br J Nurs.. 2018; 27:(8)444-448 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2018.27.8.444

Stasa H, Cashin A, Buckley T, Donoghue J. Advancing advanced practice—clarifying the conceptual confusion. Nurse Educ Today.. 2014; 34:(3)356-361 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.07.012

Williams K. Advanced practitioners in emergency care: a literature review. Emergency Nurse.. 2017; 25:(4)36-41 https://doi.org/10.7748/en.2017.e1685

Woo BFY, Lee JXY, Tam WWS. The impact of the advanced practice nursing role on quality of care, clinical outcomes, patient satisfaction, and cost in the emergency and critical care settings: a systematic review. Hum Resour Health.. 2017; 15:(1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-017-0237-9

An exploration of the role of advanced clinical practitioners in the East of England

13 August 2020
Volume 29 · Issue 15

Abstract

Medical staff shortages in the UK have provided impetus for the introduction of advanced clinical practitioners (ACPs). This case study explored the views of 22 ACPs, managers and doctors in primary and acute settings in a region of England, to understand how the role is used, and barriers and facilitators to its success. ACP roles improved the quality of service provision, provided clinical career development and enhanced job satisfaction for staff and required autonomous clinical decision-making, with a high degree of self-awareness and individual accountability. Barriers included disparate pay-scales and funding, difficulty accessing continuing education and research, and lack of agreed role definition and title, due to a lack of standardised regulation and governance, and organisational barriers, including limited access to referral systems. Facilitators were supportive colleagues and opportunities for peer networking. Regulation of ACP roles is urgently needed, along with evaluation of the cost-effectiveness and patient experience of such roles.

Shortfalls in the NHS workforce, and increasing demands on health in the UK, provided the original impetus for introducing the advanced clinical practitioner (ACP) role, which used and expanded the skills of nurses and other healthcare practitioners into areas traditionally confined to doctors (Imison et al, 2016; NHS England, 2017).

The emphasis was on a generic, higher level of expertise rather than highly specialised expertise, so that ACPs could care for patients as they presented with a variety of undefined and undiagnosed conditions. In 2017, NHS England produced a document outlining a ‘multi-professional framework for advanced clinical practice in England’ that set out an agreed definition for advanced clinical practice, encompassing the ‘four pillars’ of capability (clinical practice, leadership and management, education and research) (NHS England, 2017). The aim of the framework was to ensure, ‘safety, quality and effectiveness’ (NHS England, 2017).

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Nursing and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for nurses. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to clinical or professional articles

  • Unlimited access to the latest news, blogs and video content