References

Boaz A, Hanney S, Jones T, Soper B Does the engagement of clinicians and organisations in research improve healthcare performance: a three-stage review. BMJ Open. 2015; 5:(12) https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009415

Boaz A, Biri D, McKevitt C Rethinking the relationship between science and society: has there been a shift in attitudes to patient and public involvement and public engagement in science in the United Kingdom?. Health Expect. 2016; 19:(3)592-601 https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12295

Braun V, Clarke V Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006; 3:(2)77-101 https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Hansen BR, Whitehouse CL, Nkimbeng M Capturing the value and core concepts of the clinical research nurse. J Res Nurs. 2022; 27:(1–2)32-47 https://doi.org/10.1177/17449871211073760

Henshall C, Kozlowska O, Walthall H, Heinen A, Smith R, Carding P Interventions and strategies aimed at clinical academic pathway development for nurses in the United Kingdom: a systematised review of the literature. J Clin Nurs. 2021; 30:(11–12)1502-1518 https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15657

NHS England. 2022. https://tinyurl.com/4csd2a5f

Chief midwifery officer for England's strategic plan for research. 2023. https://tinyurl.com/3tfzfr3z

Nielsen K, Miraglia M What works for whom in which circumstances? On the need to move beyond the ‘what works?’ question in organizational intervention research. Hum Relat. 2017; 70:(1)40-62 https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726716670226

Ozdemir BA, Karthikesalingam A, Sinha S Research activity and the association with mortality. PLoS One. 2015; 10:(2) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118253

Putnam ROxford: Oxford University Press; 2002

Roodbari H, Nielsen K, Axtell C, Peters SE, Sorensen G Developing middle range theories in realist evaluation: a case of an organisational intervention. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18:(16) https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168360

Vannebo BI, Ljunggren EB Bridging or bonding: an organisational framework for studying social capital in kindergardens. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18:(5) https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052663

Whitehouse CL, Copping J, Morris P An organisational approach to building research capacity among nurses, midwives and allied health professionals (NMAHPs) in clinical practice. International Practice Development Journal. 2022a; 12:(2) https://doi.org/10.19043/ipdj.122.009

Whitehouse CL, Tinkler L, Jackson C Embedding research (ER) led by nurses, midwives and allied health professionals (NMAHPs): the NMAHPER model. BMJ Leader. 2022b; 2:(4) https://doi.org/10.1136/leader-2021-000578

Whitehouse CL, Crane R, Rostron H, Cater K Max's legacy: an evaluation of the impacts of baby loss on staff and families. British Journal of Midwifery. 2023; 31:(7) https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2023.31.7.368

Whitehouse CL, Hall H, Shiju M, Webster J, Yazbek J, Parslow-Williams S Exploring the sustainable impacts of a clinical healthcare research scholarship programme. Br J Nurs. 2024; 33:(11)515-521 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2024.0035.

Developing critical enquiry, capacity, capability and confidence in the health and care workforce

13 August 2024
Volume 33 · Issue 15

Abstract

Background:

Health and care staff have limited opportunities to design, deliver and lead critical enquiry activities.

Aims:

To explore barriers and enablers of building capacity, capability and confidence of these practitioners who wish to undertake critical enquiry activity.

Methods:

A realist conceptual framework including the development of middle range theory allowed analysis of the scholarship process and outcomes. Data were collected through snap surveys, interviews (face to face and online) and project output (posters).

Results:

Nine scholars completed the programme and all participated in the study. They all experienced an increase in capacity, capability and confidence in critical enquiry activity. Six overarching themes arose from analysis of the interviews and snap survey data: value; expertise; attitudes; meaningful, responsive support; brain space; and skill and knowledge acquisition.

Discussion:

A combined focus on people and project while staff remained embedded in their work area was key for the growth of skills and knowledge and creating impact from projects. Guilt at having dedicated time to take part in the programme was a self-imposed barrier to building capacity and capability. Social capital (gained from bringing together individuals from different groups with shared values) facilitated bonding, which increased psychological safety and helped enable capability and confidence.

Conclusion:

The combination of theory and practice embedded in a real-world context led to positive outcomes for staff, patients, carers and the facilitation team as real-life changes were made in clinical environments.

Providing more opportunities for the health and care workforce to participate in research, quality improvement projects and service evaluations (critical enquiry activities) increases employee retention and improves patient safety (Boaz et al, 2015).

The NHS long term plan recognises the importance of increasing research capacity and capability within the NHS and advocates for study and innovation initiatives to improve future outcomes (NHS England, 2019). Several national strategies (NHS, 2021; NHS England, 2022; 2023) have created a step change in nursing, midwifery and allied health profession research in England; however, to take strategies and transform them into reality in clinical practice, all stakeholders – such as organisations (involving boards and management), practitioners and professional bodies – need to think differently about how to make this happen.

Scoping the capacity and capability of nursing, midwifery and allied health professionals to design, deliver and lead embedded critical enquiry activities in one East of England NHS trust showed that such opportunities for these staff were limited (Whitehouse et al, 2022a). This scoping work also identified fewer opportunities, both clinical and non-clinical, for health and care staff outside medicine and dentistry.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Nursing and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for nurses. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to clinical or professional articles

  • Unlimited access to the latest news, blogs and video content