References

Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2006; 3:(2)77-101 https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. CASP systematic review checklist. CASP checklist: 10 questions to help you make sense of a systematic review. 2018. https://casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists (accessed 6 June 2023)

Garcia M, Mulvagh SL, Bairey Merz CN, Buring JE, Manson JE. Cardiovascular disease in women. Circ Res. 2016; 118:(8)1273-1293 https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.307547

Gordon NP, Hsueh L. Racial/ethnic, gender, and age group differences in cardiometabolic risks among adults in a Northern California health plan: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2021; 21:(1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11011-4

Marti-Soler H, Gubelmann C, Aeschbacher S Seasonality of cardiovascular risk factors: an analysis including over 230 000 participants in 15 countries. Heart. 2014; 100:(19)1517-1523 https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2014-305623

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021; 372 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Panza GA, Puhl RM, Taylor BA, Zaleski AL, Livingston J, Pescatello LS. Links between discrimination and cardiovascular health among socially stigmatized groups: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2019; 14:(6) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217623

Philippart R, Brunet-Bernard A, Clementy N Prognostic value of CHA2DS2-VASc score in patients with ‘non-valvular atrial fibrillation’ and valvular heart disease: the Loire Valley Atrial Fibrillation Project. Eur Heart J. 2015; 36:(28)1822-1830 https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv163

Ryan TJ, Antman EM, Brooks NH 1999 update: ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction: executive summary and recommendations. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction). Circulation. 1999; 100:(9)1016-1030 https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.100.9.1016

Scharm H, Kallinger SM, Eder S, Boecker M, Forkmann T, Baumeister H. Development of Rasch-based short screenings for the assessment of treatment motivation in patients with cardiovascular diseases. Disabil Rehabil. 2020; 42:(17)2519-2529 https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2018.1561959

Tod D, Booth A, Smith B. Critical appraisal. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol. 2022; 15:(1)52-72 https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2021.1952471

van Oosterhout REM, de Boer AR, Maas AHEM, Rutten FH, Bots ML, Peters SAE. Sex differences in symptom presentation in acute coronary syndromes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020; 9:(9) https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.014733

World Health Organization. Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). 2021. https://tinyurl.com/y99h268y (accessed 7 June 2023)

Yu S, McEniery CM. Central versus peripheral artery stiffening and cardiovascular risk. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2020; 40:(5)1028-1033 https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.120.313128

Zhao M, Woodward M, Vaartjes I Sex differences in cardiovascular medication prescription in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020; 9:(11) https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.014742

Gender differences in acute care treatments for cardiovascular diseases

22 June 2023
Volume 32 · Issue 12

Abstract

Background:

This narrative review aimed to identify gender-related differences in multiple cardiovascular disease treatments and to provide an overview of the possible causes to aid in establishment of a cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk profile.

Methods:

A narrative review methodology was used. A systematic search of two databases, PubMed and CINAHL, sourced 245 articles.

Results:

Seven articles met the inclusion criteria. Three recurrent themes emerged from the literature. These were gender differences in the burden of CVD, gender differences in symptom presentation and gender differences in management and treatment of CVD.

Conclusion:

CVD can be expressed differently in women and men. Different approaches to diagnosis and treatment are required. The studies included in this review reflect findings reported in research conducted more than 10 years ago, suggesting that more focus is needed to define and add gender-related indicators to current risk assessments and management strategies.

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a term used for blood vessel and heart disorders (World Health Organization (WHO), 2021). Coronary artery disease is a type of CVD that is caused when low-density lipoproteins (bad fats), also known as bad cholesterol, are deposited inside blood vessels, which causes them to narrow, blocking blood flow reaching the heart or the brain (WHO, 2021). CVD is known globally as a major cause of death (Zhao et al, 2020). According to WHO, in 2019 approximately 17.9 million deaths occurred from cardiovascular diseases, reflecting 32% of all deaths globally. Of that 32%, 85% were caused by myocardial infarction (MI) and strokes alone (WHO, 2021). Disease burden and deaths can be significantly reduced by early identification and treatment alongside awareness of possible risk factors. Possible risk factors include high blood pressure, high cholesterol levels, obesity and a family history of cardiovascular disease. Commencing drugs such as statins, maintaining a balanced diet and quitting smoking have been proven to reduce the risk of developing CVD (Gordon and Hsueh, 2021).

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Nursing and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for nurses. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to clinical or professional articles

  • Unlimited access to the latest news, blogs and video content