References

Chiong-Rivero H, Ryan GW, Flippen C Patients' and caregivers' experiences of the impact of Parkinson's disease on health status. Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2011; 2011:(2)57-70 https://doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S15986

Corbin JM, Strauss AL. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 2008

Ellingsen S, Roxberg Å, Kristoffersen K, Rosland JH, Alvsvåg H. The pendulum time of life: the experience of time, when living with severe incurable disease—a phenomenological and philosophical study. Med Health Care Philos. 2015; 18:(2)203-215 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-014-9590-9

Frazzitta G, Bertotti G, Riboldazzi G Effectiveness of intensive inpatient rehabilitation treatment on disease progression in parkinsonian patients: a randomized controlled trial with 1-year follow-up. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012; 26:(2)144-150 https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968311416990

Frazzitta G, Maestri R, Bertotti G Intensive rehabilitation treatment in early Parkinson's disease: a randomized pilot study with a 2-year follow-up. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015; 29:(2)123-131 https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968314542981

Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. ‘Mini-mental state’. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975; 12:(3)189-198

Giardini A, Pisoni C, Ines G, Borelli V, Scoccia E, Majani G. ICF, quality of life, and depression in breast cancer: perceived disability in disease-free women 6 months after mastectomy. Support Care Cancer. 2013; 21:(9)2453-2460 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-013-1794-7

Giardini A, Pierobon A, Callegari S Towards proactive active living: patients with Parkinson's disease experience of a multidisciplinary intensive rehabilitation treatment. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2017; 53:(1)114-124 https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.16.04213-1

Hariz G-M, Limousin P, Tisch S, Jahanshahi M, Fjellman-Wiklund A. Patients' perceptions of life shift after deep brain stimulation for primary dystonia: a qualitative study. Mov Disord. 2011; 26:(11)2101-2106 https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.23796

Hoehn MM, Yahr MD. Parkinsonism: onset, progression and mortality. Neurology. 1967; 17:(5)427-442 https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.17.5.427

Maffoni M, Giardini A, Pierobon A, Ferrazzoli D, Frazzitta G. Stigma experienced by Parkinson's disease patients: a descriptive review of qualitative studies. Parkinson's Dis. 2017; 2017 https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7203259

Pierobon A, Giardini A, Callegari S, Majani G. Psychological adjustment to a chronic illness: the contribution from cognitive behavioural treatment in a rehabilitation setting. G Ital Med Lav Ergon. 2011; 33:A11-18

Pierobon A, Giardini A, Maestri R Disexecutive functions and depression in patients with Parkinson disease: the impact on rehabilitation outcome. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2014; 93:(9)764-773 https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000000092

Plouvier AOA, Olde Hartman TC, van Litsenburg A, Bloem BR, van Weel C, Lagro-Janssen ALM. Being in control of Parkinson's disease: A qualitative study of community-dwelling patients' coping with changes in care. Eur J Gen Pract. 2018; 24:(1)138-145 https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2018.1447561

Smith LJ, Shaw RL. Learning to live with Parkinson's disease in the family unit: an interpretative phenomenological analysis of well-being. Med Health Care Philos. 2017; 20:(1)13-21 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-016-9716-3

Sunvisson H, Ekman SL. Environmental influences on the experiences of people with Parkinson's disease. Nurs Inq. 2001; 8:(1)41-50

Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007; 19:(6)349-357 https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042

Valcarenghi RV, Alvarez AM, Santos SSC, Siewert JS, Nunes SFL, Tomasi AVR. The daily lives of people with Parkinson's disease. Rev Bras Enferm. 2018; 71:(2)272-279 https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2016-0577

Van Der Bruggen H, Widdershoven G. Being a Parkinson's patient: immobile and unpredictably whimsical literature and existential analysis. Med Health Care Philos. 2004; 7:(3)289-301

Vescovelli F, Sarti D, Ruini C. Subjective and psychological well-being in Parkinson's Disease: a systematic review. Acta Neurol Scand. 2018; 138:(1)12-23 https://doi.org/10.1111/ane.12946

Williams S, Keady J. ‘A stony road… a 19 year journey’: ‘bridging’ through late-stage Parkinson's disease. J Res Nurs. 2008; 13:(5)373-388 https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987108095160

World Health Organization. ICF: international classification of functioning, disability, and health. 2001. https://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en/ (accessed 24 May 2019)

World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013; 310:(20)2191-2194 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053

Living with Parkinson's—past, present and future: a qualitative study of the subjective perspective

27 June 2019
Volume 28 · Issue 12

Abstract

Background:

the social impact of Parkinson's is difficult to capture in quantitative research given the condition's variable presentation, so qualitative research is needed to support a person-centred approach.

Aims:

to describe how people with Parkinson's experience living with their condition over time.

Methods:

27 audio-recorded verbatim-transcribed interviews were analysed through the grounded theory method.

Findings:

past, present and future were the core categories that emerged. Past is the dimension of regretted memories of past life overturned by the communication of diagnosis. Present is the time dimension in which patients concretely experience the hindrances associated with the condition (loss of autonomy, submissive acceptance and social embarrassment), and the resources (search for autonomy, serene or in-progress acceptance, and social support). Future is characterised by both positive visions of tomorrow and negative ones (worry, resignation, denial).

Conclusion:

these results, highlighting what living with Parkinson's means over time, may contribute to a better tailoring of nursing practice to the person's needs and rhythm, in a perspective of continuous adaptation.

The social impact of Parkinson's is difficult to capture in quantitative research given the condition's variable presentation. Moreover, disability is a complex concept that is based, according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), on the interaction between the subject's health condition and personal and environmental factors (World Health Organization (WHO), 2001) including all the possible psychological and clinical implications (Giardini et al, 2013). Consequently, a quantitative approach may not be sufficient as a methodology to describe disability and deal with the issues of Parkinson's, since it captures little of a person's lived experience (Van Der Bruggen and Widdershoven, 2004) and little of the interconnected psychosocial and medical reality of the disabling implications of Parkinson's.

Therefore, a qualitative approach may be the best method to increase health professionals' understanding of the subjective experience of people living with the condition (Hariz et al, 2011; Valcarenghi et al, 2018). Over the past 10 years, only a few qualitative studies have provided a global view of Parkinson's based on patients' subjective experiences (Williams and Keady, 2008; Chiong-Rivero et al, 2011; Valcarenghi et al, 2018).

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Nursing and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for nurses. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to clinical or professional articles

  • Unlimited access to the latest news, blogs and video content