References

Operational productivity and performance in English NHS acute hospitals: Unwarranted variations. 2016. https://tinyurl.com/y23kknvm (accessed 25 March 2020)

Drake R. Nursing workforce planning: insights from seven Malaysian hospitals. Br J Nurs. 2013; 22:(2)95-100 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2013.22.2.95

Drake RG. The ‘Robust’ roster: exploring the nurse rostering process. J Adv Nurs. 2014a; 70:(9)2095-2106 https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12367

Drake RG. The nurse rostering problem: from operational research to organizational reality?. J Adv Nurs. 2014b; 70:(4)800-810 https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12238

Drake RG. Does longer roster lead-time reduce temporary staff usage? A regression analysis of e-rostering data from 77 hospital units. J Adv Nurs. 2018; 74:(8)1831-1838 https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13578

Hours per patient day: understanding this key measure of productivity. 2016. https://tinyurl.com/wxgjly5 (accessed 25 March 2020)

Government of Western Australia, Department of Health. Nursing hours per patient day. 2020. https://tinyurl.com/utzz96g (accessed 25 March 2020)

Hinchliffe S. delivering quality care through effective nursing establishments. Nursing Establishment Review Trust Board paper.Leeds: Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust; 2013

Hunt PS. Developing a staffing plan to meet inpatient needs. Nursing Management. 2018; 49:(5)24-31 https://doi.org/ 10.1097/01.NUMA.0000532326.62369.9b

Selecting and applying methods for estimating the size and mix of nursing teams: a systematic review of the literature commissioned by the Department of Health. 2003. https://tinyurl.com/wdozw7w (accessed 26 March 2020)

International Council of Nurses. The global nursing shortage: priority areas for intervention. 2006. https://tinyurl.com/qmafnm8 (accessed 26 March 2020)

International Council of Nurses. ICN International Workforce Forum calls for urgent action from governments to address global nursing shortage. 2019. https://tinyurl.com/y54t325y (accessed 26 March 2020)

Johnson CJ, Croghan E, Crawford J. The problem and management of sickness absence in the NHS: considerations for nurse managers. J Nurs Manag. 2003; 11:(5)336-342 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2834.2003.00404.x

Kirby KK. Hours per patient day: not the problem, nor the solution. Nurs Econ. 2015; 33:(1)64-66

McIntyre L. Good practice guide: rostering.London: NHS Improvement; 2016

Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust. The management and production of staff rosters. 2017. https://tinyurl.com/w5lhv5f (accessed 26 March 2020)

NHS Digital. NHS sickness absence rates—January 2018 to March 2018 and annual summary 2009-10 to 2017-18. 2018. https://tinyurl.com/t5lv35w (accessed 26 March 2020)

NHS England, NHS Improvement. Care hours per patient day (CHPPD): guidance for all inpatient trusts. 2019a. https://tinyurl.com/r76r9c6 (accessed 30 March 2020)

NHS England, NHS Improvement, Nursing and midwifery e-rostering: a good practice guide. 2019b. https://tinyurl.com/u72c344 (accessed 30 March 2020)

NHS Improvement. An improvement resource for adult inpatient wards in acute hospitals. Safe, sustainable and productive staffing. 2018. https://tinyurl.com/ycovoa33 (accessed 26 March 2020)

NHS Staff Council. NHS terms and conditions of service handbook. 2019. https://tinyurl.com/y6k52rxl (accessed 30 March 2020)

NHS Workforce Deployment Expert Group. Chapter 5. Practical example of e-rostering impact. 2018. https://www.beyondtheroster.co.uk/e-rostering-impact (accessed 30 March 2020)

E-rostering policy (version 3). Stockton on Tees: North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust. 2018;

North Staffordshire Combined Healthcare NHS Trust. Minutes of a meeting of the trust board 8 September 2016. 2016. https://tinyurl.com/qnunu2o (accessed 30 March 2020)

North Staffordshire Combined Healthcare NHS Trust. Minutes of a meeting of the trust board 8 June 2017. 2017. https://tinyurl.com/tc6d3t2 (accessed 30 March 2020)

Nursing and Midwifery Council. Continuing professional development. 2019. https://tinyurl.com/nmc-reval (accessed 26 March 2020)

Scottish Executive Health Department. Response to the Nursing & Midwifery Workload & Workforce Planning Project. 2004. https://tinyurl.com/s62o2am

Shelford Group. Safer nursing care tool. Implementation resource pack. 2013. https://tinyurl.com/va3dqoj (accessed 30 March 2020)

Six month safer staffing review: report to the Trust board. North Staffordshire Combined Healthcare NHS Trusts. 2015. https://tinyurl.com/tgrpgdw (accessed 26 March 2020)

University College Cork. Evaluation of the ‘Pilot implementation of the framework for safe nurse staffing and skill-mix’. 2018. https://tinyurl.com/u4akgvf (accessed 30 March 2020)

Nurse staffing review. Report to open Trust board. North Staffordshire Combined Healthcare NHS Trusts. 2014. https://tinyurl.com/yx224l6q (accessed 26 March 2020)

Wise S. Wanted: the next generation of nurse and midwifery managers. Int J Public Sector Management. 2007; 20:(6)473-483 https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550710818368

Staff unavailability and safe staffing: are headroom allowances ‘realistic’?

02 April 2020
17 min read
Volume 29 · Issue 7

Abstract

Background:

‘Hours per patient day’ (HPPD) is an internationally recognised resourcing metric used to measure direct nursing care hours. However, hospitals often underestimate indirect time (unavailability) and specify unrealistic targets for planned unavailability (‘headroom’).

Aims:

To investigate the disparities between planned unavailability (‘headroom’) and actual staff unavailability.

Methods:

Data were collected from the e-rostering systems of 87 NHS trusts. This was compared with published data from 35 roster policies.

Results:

Many hospitals use headroom as a key performance indicator (KPI) and set targets for its components in their roster policies. This research highlights large variations in unavailability (15.8% to 33.6%) and lower variations in headroom (16–26%).

Conclusion:

Hospitals operationalise headroom around an idealised ‘target’ value. This may be detrimental. Compelling a unit with unavailability of between 28% and 30% to adopt an institution-wide headroom of 22% (for example) may, at best, increase spending on bank/agency staff, or, at worse, jeopardise patient safety.

The use of ‘hours per patient day’ (HPPD) plus planned unavailability (‘headroom’) for staff resource budgeting is almost ubiquitous. This approach can be found in many countries, including Australia (Government of Western Australia, Department of Health, 2020), the Republic of Ireland (University College Cork, 2018), Malaysia (Drake, 2013), the USA (Fike and Smith-Stoner, 2016) and the UK (NHS England and NHS Improvement, 2019a). HPPD is a long-established, easy-to-use metric for determining unit budgets and comparing staff resourcing across organisations (Kirby, 2015). It is a measure of direct hours per patient day; however, in a 24/7 care environment there are indirect staff costs (annual leave, sickness, study leave, parental leave and non-clinical work) that must be included when calculating the staffing budget for a unit. In the budgetary process, these indirect costs, often called ‘unavailability’, are offset using a ‘headroom’ allowance (Hunt, 2018). It is crucial that this allowance is ‘realistic’ (NHS England and NHS Improvement, 2019b:12).

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Nursing and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for nurses. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to clinical or professional articles

  • Unlimited access to the latest news, blogs and video content