References
Residual liberty and the detained mental health patient
Abstract
Richard Griffith, Senior Lecturer in Health Law at Swansea University, considers the notion of residual liberty and the need for further authorisation when a detained patient is given treatment for a physical disorder under restraint
The purpose of the Mental Health Act 1983 is to make provision for the detention and compulsory treatment of a person's mental disorder where they are objecting to that admission or treatment (Tameside & Glossop Acute Services NHS Trust v CH [1996]).
Compulsory treatment of a detained patient under Part 4 of the Act has long adopted a ‘treatment as a whole’ approach that allows for the physical manifestations of a mental disorder to be treated under the compulsory provisions. In B v Croydon Health Authority [1995], the court held that tube-feeding a detained patient with a personality disorder who self-harmed by starving was treatment for a mental disorder that could be administered lawfully without the patient's consent.
The treatment as a whole approach does not include treatment for a physical condition unrelated to a person's mental disorder. In St George's Healthcare NHS Trust v S [1998] the Court of Appeal declared that detaining a woman under the 1983 Act in order to dispense with her refusal to consent to treatment for pre-eclampsia was unlawful. A person detained under the Act retained the right to withhold consent to medical procedures unrelated to their mental disorder.
Register now to continue reading
Thank you for visiting British Journal of Nursing and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for nurses. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:
What's included
-
Limited access to clinical or professional articles
-
Unlimited access to the latest news, blogs and video content