References

Alexandre NMC, Coluci MZO. Validade de conteúdo nos processos de construção e adaptação de instrumentos de medidas [Content validity in the development and adaptation processes of measurement instruments] (article in Portuguese). Cien Saude Colet. 2011; 16:(7)3061-3068 https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232011000800006

Armstrong DG, Mills JL. Toward a change in syntax in diabetic foot care: prevention equals remission. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2013; 103:(2)161-162 https://doi.org/10.7547/1030161

Armstrong DG, Boulton AJM, Bus SA. Diabetic foot ulcers and their recurrence. N Engl J Med. 2017; 376:(24)2367-2375 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1615439

Bakker K. Diretrizes práticas sobre o tratamento e a prevenção do pé diabético. In: Pedrosa HC, Vilar L, Boulton AJM (eds). São Paulo: Editora Santos; 2014

The 2015 IWGDF guidance documents on prevention and management of foot problems in diabetes: development of an evidence-based global consensus. 2015. https://tinyurl.com/59d8xncx (accessed 28 May 2021)

Bergin SM, Nube VL, Alford JB Australian Diabetes Foot Network: practical guideline on the provision of footwear for people with diabetes. J Foot Ankle Res. 2013; 6:(1) https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-6-6

Boulton AJM, Armstrong DG, Albert SF Comprehensive foot examination and risk assessment: a report of the task force of the foot care interest group of the American Diabetes Association, with endorsement by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists. Diabetes Care. 2008; 31:(8)1679-1685 https://doi.org/10.2337/dc08-9021

Boulton AJM, Armstrong DG, Kirsner RS Diagnosis and management of diabetic foot complications.Arlington (VA): American Diabetes Association; 2018 https://doi.org/10.2337/db20182-1

Bus SA, Haspels R, Busch-Westbroek TE. Evaluation and optimization of therapeutic footwear for neuropathic diabetic foot patients using in-shoe plantar pressure analysis. Diabetes Care. 2011; 34:(7)1595-1600 https://doi.org/10.2337/dc10-2206

A técnica Delphi e seu isso na pesquisa de enfermagem: revisão bibliográfica. 2009. http://www.reme.org.br/artigo/detalhes/209 (accessed 29 May 2021)

de Almeida MHM, Spínola AWP, Lancman S. Técnica Delphi: validação de um instrumento para uso do terapeuta ocupacional em gerontologia. Rev Ter Ocup Univ Sao Paulo. 2009; 20:(1)49-58 https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2238-6149.v20i1p49-58

Frykberg RG, Zgonis T, Armstrong DG Diabetic foot disorders. A clinical practice guideline (2006 revision). J Foot Ankle Surg. 2006; 45:S1-66 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1067-2516(07)60001-5

Gamba MA, Pedrosa H, Vilar L, Boulton AJ O papel da enfermagem na educação e nos cuidados com os pés dos pacientes com diabetes mellitus. In: Pedrosa HC, Vilar L, Boulton AJM (eds). São Paulo: Editora Santos; 2014

International Diabetes Federation. Diabetes atlas. 2017a. https://tinyurl.com/4z387m3v (accessed 4 June 2021)

International Diabetes Federation. IDF clinical practice recommendations on the diabetic foot—2017: a guide for healthcare professionals. 2017b. https://tinyurl.com/358tuddm (accessed 28 May 2021)

International Diabetes Federation. IDF diabetes atlas. 2019. https://diabetesatlas.org/en/ (accessed 28 May 2021)

International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot. IWGDF Practical guidelines on the prevention and management of diabetic foot disease. Part of the 2019 IWGDF guidelines on the prevention and management of diabetic foot disease. 2019. https://tinyurl.com/ywbanb6c (accessed 9 June 2021)

Mancussi e Faro AC. Técnica Delphi na validação das intervenções de enfermagem [The Delphi technique to validate nursing interventions]. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 1997; 31:(2)259-273

Miller JD, Carter E, Shih J How to do a 3-minute diabetic foot exam. J Fam Pract. 2014; 63:(11)646-656

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Diabetic foot problems: prevention and management. NICE guideline 19. 2019. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng19 (accessed 28 May 2021)

Neuropatias e pé diabético. In: Pedrosa HC, Vilar L, Boulton AJM (eds). Rio de Janeiro: Editora AC Farmacêutica, Grupo Editorial Nacional; 2014

Pham H, Armstrong DG, Harvey C, Harkless LB, Giurini JM, Veves A. Screening techniques to identify people at high risk for diabetic foot ulceration: a prospective multicenter trial. Diabetes Care. 2000; 23:(5)606-611 https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.23.5.606

Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2006; 29:(5)489-497 https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147

Schaper NC, Van Netten JJ, Apelqvist J, Lipsky BA, Bakker K Prevention and management of foot problems in diabetes: a summary guidance for daily practice 2015, based on the IWGDF guidance documents. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2016; 32:7-15 https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.2695

Grupo de Trabalho Internacional sobre Pé Diabético. 2001. Consenso Internacional sobre Pé Diabético. Brasília: Secretaria de Estado da Saúde do Distrito Federal. 2001;

Diretrizes da Sociedade Brasileira de Diabetes 2019–2020.São Paulo: Ed Clannad; 2020

Sousa CS, Turrini RNT. Validação de constructo de tecnologia educativa para pacientes mediante aplicação da técnica Delphi. Acta Paul Enferm. 2012; 25:(6)990-996 https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-21002012000600026

Spínola AWP. Delfos: proposta tecnológica alternativa: edição preliminar.São Paulo: Faculdade de Saúde Pública, Universidade de São Paulo; 1984

Teles LM, Oliveira AS, Campos FC Construção e validação de manual educativo para acompanhtes durante o trabalho de parto e parto [Development and validating an educational booklet for childbirth companions] (article in Portuguese). Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2014; 48:(6)977-984 https://doi.org/10.1590/S0080-623420140000700003

Titler MG, Kleiber C, Steelman VJ The Iowa model of evidence-based practice to promote quality care. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 200; 13:(4)497-509

van Netten JJ, Lazzarini PA, Armstrong DG Diabetic foot Australia guideline on footwear for people with diabetes. J Foot Ankle Res. 2018; 11:(1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-017-0244-z

Wu S, Armstrong D, Lavery LA. Clinical examination of the diabetic foot and the identification of the at-risk patient. In: Veves A, Giurini JM, LoGerfo FW (eds). Totowa (NJ): Humana Press; 2006 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-075-1_11

World Union of Wound Healing Societies. Position document: local management of diabetic foot ulcers. 2016. https://tinyurl.com/jzkcmfpc (accessed 28 May 2021)

Development and validation of a pocket guide for the prevention of diabetic foot ulcers

24 June 2021
15 min read
Volume 30 · Issue 12

Abstract

Objective:

Diabetic foot ulcers can have serious consequences, including amputation. This project aimed to develop and validate a diabetes care management model—a pocket guide on the prevention of foot ulceration to assist health professionals and scientific societies.

Methods:

An adaptation of the Iowa method of evidence-based practice to promote high-quality care was employed. After problems are identified, the Iowa method supports the development of an action plan for addressing them. An evidence-based protocol based on the five cornerstones of the 2015 guidance on the diabetic foot by the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot was developed in two phases and validated using the Delphi technique.

Results:

A model was developed to promote these five cornerstones, which are the main recommendations for managing the diabetic foot. These are: foot examination; risk assessment for ulceration; education in diabetes; appropriate footwear; and treatment of pre-ulcerative lesions. To adapt this into a health information document, the management model was synthesised and designed as a pocket guide. The model's individual and global content validity indices surpass 0.78 and 0.90 respectively.

Conclusion:

A management model was created and validated, and produced as a pocket guide to deliver instructions on the care and prevention of diabetic foot problems in people with diabetes.

The prevalence of diabetes has reached concerning levels worldwide, particularly in developing countries. According to the latest data released by the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) (2019), 463 million people across the globe are affected by diabetes, which corresponds to 9.3% of the global population.

About 26 million people with diabetes develop foot ulcers annually (Bakker et al, 2015; International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF), 2019). Medical expenses for people who have both diabetes and ulcers are five times higher than for those who have diabetes but no ulcer (IDF, 2017a). Moreover, ulcers may lead to amputation, an outcome 20 times more common in people with diabetes than in people without diabetes (IDF, 2017b). Among all amputations associated with foot ulcers, diabetic foot ulcers lead to up to 83% of major amputations and 96% of minor amputations (World Union of Wound Healing Societies, 2016). In addition, patients who have amputations related to diabetic foot ulcers have extremely high mortality rates, with up to 70% dying within 5 years (Bakker et al, 2015).

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Nursing and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for nurses. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to clinical or professional articles

  • Unlimited access to the latest news, blogs and video content