Albisinni S, Aoun F, Quackels T, Assenmacher G, Peltier A, van Velthoven R, Roumeguère T Validated prospective assessment of quality of life after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: beyond continence and erections. Am J Men Health. 2019; 13:(3)

Arroyo C, Martini A, Wang J, Tewari AK Anatomical, surgical and technical factors influencing continence after radical prostatectomy. Ther Adv Urol. 2019;

Clark CB, Kucherov V, Klonieck E, Shenot PJ, Das AK Management of urinary incontinence following treatment of prostate disease. Can J Urol. 2021; 28:(S2)38-43

Donovan JL, Hamdy FC, Lane JA Patient-Reported Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016; 375:(15)1425-1437

Fode M, Krogh-Jespersen S, Brackett NL, Ohl DA, Lynne CM, Sønksen J Male sexual dysfunction and infertility associated with neurological disorders. Asian J Androl. 2012; 14:(1)61-68

García Cortés Á, Colombás Vives J, Gutiérrez Castañé C What is the impact of post-radical prostatectomy urinary incontinence on everyday quality of life? Linking Pad usage and International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short-Form (ICIQ-SF) for a COMBined definition (PICOMB definition). Neurourol Urodyn. 2021; 40:(3)840-847

Goonewardene SS, Gillatt D, Persad R A systematic review of PFE pre-prostatectomy. J Robot Surg. 2018; 12:(3)397-400

Hodges P, Stafford R, Coughlin GD Efficacy of a personalised pelvic floor muscle training programme on urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy (MaTchUP): protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. e2018

Huynh LM, Tran J, See K, Jaime A, Su HW, Ahlering TE Validation of “patient-reported outcomes via online questionnaire” as a urinary continence assessment and quality improvement tool following radical prostatectomy. Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations. 2021; 39:(1)72.e15-72.e20

Macaulay M, Broadbridge J, Gage H A trial of devices for urinary incontinence after treatment for prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2015; 116:(3)432-442

Marchioni M, Primiceri G, Castellan P Conservative management of urinary incontinence following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2020; 72:(5)555-562

Murphy C, Laine C, Macaulay M, Fader M Development and randomised controlled trial of a continence product patient decision aid for men postradical prostatectomy. J Clin Nurs. 2020; 29:(13-14)2251-2259

Mungovan SF, Carlsson SV, Gass GC Preoperative exercise interventions to optimize continence outcomes following radical prostatectomy. Nat Rev Urol. 2021; 18:(5)259-281

National Institute of Health and Care Excellence. Prostate cancer: diagnosis and management. 2021. (accessed 15 September 2022)

National Institute of Health and Care Excellence. Lower urinary tract symptoms in men: management. 2015. (accessed 15 September 2022)

Pacik D, Fedorko M Literature review of factors affecting continence after radical prostatectomy. Saudi Med J. 2017; 38:(1)9-17

Pompe RS, Tian Z, Preisser F Short- and long-term functional outcomes and quality of life after radical prostatectomy: patient-reported outcomes from a tertiary high-volume center. Eur Urol Focus. 2017; 3:(6)615-620

Rahnama'i MS, Marcelissen T, Geavlete B, Tutolo M, Hüsch T Current management of post-radical prostatectomy urinary incontinence. Front Surg. 2021; 8

Schifano N, Capogrosso P, Tutolo M, Dehò F, Montorsi F, Salonia A How to prevent and manage post-prostatectomy incontinence: a review. World J Mens Health. 2021; 39:(4)581-597

Zeng T-Y, Wu M-L-Y, Wang C-S, Xiao Q, Peng C-H The therapeutic effect of pelvic floor muscle exercise on urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis. Asian J Androl. 2019; 21:(2)170-176

Pathway for post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence: impact on patient confidence and satisfaction

13 October 2022
Volume 31 · Issue 18



Between 8% and 87% of prostatectomies result in urinary incontinence, with around half of patients using incontinence pads daily at 6 months. Specialist urology continence nurses at the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust created a pre- and post-surgical care pathway formalising support for these patients, which involves the provision of TENA Men (Essity) male incontinence pads.


This audit aimed to assess patient satisfaction with this pathway and TENA Men pads.


Patients who underwent a radical prostatectomy at NNUH between 27 April and 9 November 2021 and who required continence pads were invited to fill out an online anonymous mixed-method (mainly qualitative) survey.


Of 28 respondents, 71% reported incontinence after their surgical catheter was removed. Most (89%) were satisfied with the preoperative advice. Of 19 respondents to questions on confidence and satisfaction, 16 were confident that the pads they had been prescribed were helping them to manage urinary leakage, and 16 were confident or very confident that they could manage their incontinence themselves. Generally, respondents were confident that their overall and mental health had improved, and most were confident or very confident that they had less anxiety. However, less than a quarter of respondents were ‘very confident’ about going out, meeting people or exercising. All but one respondent found TENA Men pads easy to fit, and the most used words in the free-text explanations of what they most included ‘easy’, ‘discreet’, ‘comfortable’ and ‘unobtrusive’.


The clinical pathway helped give patients undergoing radical prostatectomy confidence in their ability to manage post-surgery incontinence themselves and could be of value in other hospitals. Easy access to incontinence pads designed for the male anatomy has an important part in this.

For the majority of patients who have recently been diagnosed with prostate cancer and who are, quite naturally, overwhelmed, post-surgery urinary incontinence and andrology issues may seem a small price to pay for being cancer free. However, once the wounds have healed and PSA values are undetectable, not having full control of their bladder function and/or not being able to achieve a full erection can have a significant impact on patients' general sense of wellbeing (Donovan et al, 2016).

In the short term, it is estimated that between 8% and 87% of patients experience urinary incontinence following surgery (Donovan et al, 2016; Arroyo et al, 2019; Hodges et al, 2020; Huynh et al, 2021). This wide variance may result from differing definitions of incontinence and durations from surgery. In a British study, 46% of patients were using at least one incontinence pad per day at 6 months, and this figure fell to around 30% at 12 months (Donovan et al, 2016). Only 20% of men who were able to sustain an erection firm enough for intercourse prior to surgery were able to do so at 6 months post-surgery, and two-thirds of men were still affected at 6 years post-surgery.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Nursing and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for nurses. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to clinical or professional articles

  • Unlimited access to the latest news, blogs and video content