References

Antunes G, Neville E, Duffy J, Ali N BTS guidelines for the management of malignant pleural effusions. Thorax. 2003; 58:ii29-ii38 https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.58.suppl_2.ii29

Bhatnagar R, Maskell N. Developing a ‘pleural team’ to run a reactive pleural service. Clin Med (Lond). 2013; 13:(5)452-456 https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.13-5-452

Bintcliffe OJ, Clive AO, Maskell NA. Pleural disease. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016; 44:(4)P249-P254 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mpmed.2016.02.004

Botana Rial M, Fernández VL, Represas CR Cost-effectiveness study of the diagnosis of pleural effusion in chest diseases outpatient clinic. Arch Bronconeum. 2010; 46:(9)473-478 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1579-2129(10)70115-4

Bryman A. Social research methods, 5th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015

Cole E. Pleural care revolutionary. Nurs Stand. 2016; 30:(34)18-19 https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.30.34.18.s21

Davies Macmillan CA, Eaton-Smith M. 119 Nurse led management of pleural effusions. Lung Cancer. 2014; 83 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5002(14)70119-9

Devani N, Gupta U, Kaiser R, Johns RH. M19 Patient perspectives of an ambulatory pleural service. Thorax. 2016; 71 https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-209333.461

Doody O, Noonan M. Preparing and conducting interviews to collect data. Nurse Res. 2013; 20:(5)28-32 https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2013.05.20.5.28.e327

Du Rand I, Maskell N. Introduction and methods: British Thoracic Society pleural disease guideline 2010. Thorax. 2010; 65:ii1-ii3 https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.2010.137042

Fawzi A, Maddekar N, Khan S M20 Pleural service in a large university teaching hospital – 1 year retrospective review. Thorax. 2016; 71 https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-209333.462

Hooper CE, Welham SA, Maskell NA Pleural procedures and patient safety: a national BTS audit of practice. Thorax. 2015; 70:(2)189-191 https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2013-204812

Noorzad F, Ahmed L. Clinical nurse specialist led image guided pleural interventions—is it safe?. Eur Respir J. 2015; 46 https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2015.PA4346

Reid ER, Sivasothy PR, Chatterji S. S81 A randomised controlled study comparing the outcomes of pleural nurse practitioner versus doctors trained to perform pleural procedures for management of pleural effusions. Thorax. 2013; 68:A43-A44 https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2013-204457.88

Sura P, Hyde E, Afify E, Coker B. P117 ambulatory and inpatient pleural service – the way forward. Thorax. 2012; 67 https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2012-202678.400

Surange N, Murray JA, Taggart SCO. P228 Patient experience of a nurse led therapeutic pleural aspiration service. Thorax. 2010; 65 https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.2010.151068.29

Thaivalappil F, O'Neill D, Ionescu A. P71 Training of junior doctors into thoracic ultrasound and pleural procedures – impact of a dedicated respiratory consultant—supervised advanced nurse practitioner-supported session. Thorax. 2013; 68:A107-A108 https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2013-204457.221

Tye CC, Ross FM. Blurring boundaries: professional perspectives of the emergency nurse practitioner role in a major accident and emergency department. J Adv Nurs. 2000; 31:(5)1089-1096 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01380.x

Whittingham J. 118 Nurse led pleural service. Lung Cancer. 2014; 83 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5002(14)70118-7

Evaluating the impact of nurse practitioner involvement in a pleural procedures clinic

23 July 2020
13 min read
Volume 29 · Issue 14

Abstract

Background:

Pleural disease incidence is increasing and there has been a move towards outpatient management. Pleural clinics have been developed for patients to be assessed and have pleural procedures for diagnostic and symptomatic purposes.

Aim:

The study aimed to assess the impact of nurse practitioner (NP) involvement in a pleural procedures clinic on clinic capacity, and staff and patient experience.

Methods:

A mixed-methods service evaluation was completed in a medium-sized general hospital. The number of patients seen in clinic over a 6-month period at the beginning of NP involvement was compared with the number of patients seen 1 year later. Semi-structured interviews of key staff stakeholders were conducted.

Findings:

Clinic capacity increased from 4.57 to 5.86 patients per list. NP involvement increased access, improved patient care, reduced work burden for other staff and improved educational opportunities.

Conclusion:

The impact of NP involvement in the pleural clinic was seen as positive and increased clinic capacity. The same model of practice could be considered elsewhere.

Incidence of pleural disease is increasing (Bhatnagar and Maskell, 2013), affecting 3000 people per million each year (Du Rand and Maskell, 2010). Patients can present with pleural effusions associated with pleural disease or other pathologies, such as alternative malignancy, infection or left ventricular failure (Bintcliffe et al, 2016). Breathlessness associated with pleural effusions can be disabling and, therefore, access to therapeutic and potential diagnostic pleural aspiration to provide immediate relief of symptoms is essential (Bintcliffe et al, 2016).

Traditional inpatient management of pleural effusions often requires protracted and costly admissions. New systems, such as outpatient pleural procedure clinics (PPC), have been developed to avoid this (Antunes et al, 2003, Hooper et al, 2015, Botana Rial et al, 2010). Outpatient pleural services aim to provide rapid access, reduce emergency hospital admissions and provide effective and safe care that is preferred by patients (Sura et al, 2012; Bhatnagar and Maskell, 2013; Devani et al, 2016).

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Nursing and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for nurses. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to clinical or professional articles

  • Unlimited access to the latest news, blogs and video content